That proof only applies to fixed architecture feed forward multilayer perceptrons with no recurrence, iirc. Transformers are not that.

Ha I finally got it once I realized it's not about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smalltalk

I am pretty sure his choice of words was a conscious decision to do the pun.

Only if you baby it

I'm not trying to defend Google (shudder!), just trying to be helpful:

- Enabling 2fa in my accounts has solved this problem for me

- I hear that hardware security tokens are even better to get Google to not worry that you're an imposter, but I haven't done that myself

Winning arguments with analogies is like painting still life with a broad brush

Sure, some do that, not everyone. So I wouldn't call it a "failed world". I agree with your general point though.

Dip said ties in liquid nitrogen and hit them with a hammer

> The billionaires aren't differentiable

Probably because they're not continuous?

To the extent that it's rational, it's more about acceleration than velocity

It's about acceleration + other things. If the other things didn't matter, they would just drive a Tesla Model S Plaid with 2 second 0-60mph.

You can configure Emacs to open each buffer in a new frame — ie “window” and manage them with your window manager

Exactly. I share the view that it doesn't make sense to effectively have two window managers running (one in my WM and one in Emacs) with different philosophies and shortcuts. But, and in a more general sense this is the great thing about Emacs, if you don't like its default behaviour you just change it.