> Dad can either stand strong and live the example he wishes his child to follow, or cave displaying the opposite of what he said.
Or do what he told his kid, by getting his cousin (not a neighbor) to do the harming. Or perhaps to get the cousin to destroy the bully.
---
> Conversely if you live a life where you simply don’t lie for any reason, your kids will learn to live honestly.
The "your kids will learn to live honestly" doesn't necessarily track.
If you simply don't lie, that doesn't mean you won't be taken advantage of at times. Your kids might see that and decide it's not the best approach to doing things.
> No need to look for malicious intentions, this is just a feature that costs money so it's very low (or zero) priority for profit driven organisations.
Malicious in-attention then, by the profit driven org? :)
> no the "commons" in this case is the fundamental free-ness of YT ...
Hmmm, isn't the "free-ness" of YouTube because there were determined to outspend and outlast any potential competitors (ie supported by the Search business), in order to create a monopoly for then extracting $$$ from?
I'm kind of expecting the extracting part is only getting started. :(
reply