Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | johnnyanmac's commentslogin

Similar thing in California. And good ol' fronttunner for president Gavin Newsom is actively trying to kill it.

Just to remind you that he's still indeed an Establishment Democrat. He won't drown us in fascism, but he sure isn't fighting for the working class.


Why are income brackets unconstitutional?

Even with Biden, the pandemic situation was handled relatively well compared to most of the world. We were due for a "soft landing", and then we voted to instead tax ourselves with tsrriffs and scare off the lion's share of our tourism. Oh, and give tax cuts to billionaires, of course.

>do you have a realistic proposal?

Realistic in this administration? No. They will keep taking and taking from the working class and pitting them against one another. There's no solution there when the government is actively looking to sabatoge the system.

Arguing over tobacco premiums is pennies on the dollar. Pretty much every other civilized country has figured something out with regards to universal healthcare. I'm sure there's dozens of solutions out there to choose from. The only real steps to take right now is to have Americans stop licking the boot and actually push for something that helps them.


the intermediate is that the cuts took effect in January.

We're still on a massive defecit, so yes? We didn't have that tarriffs money hanging out in a vault.

Tariffs do hang out in a vault for a period of time when the importer can challenge the collection or the amount.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/06/cbp-tells-judge-it-...

> Under customs law, importers generally have about 314 days after goods enter the country before a tariff payment is finalized, a process known as “liquidation.”

> If companies fail to challenge the duty and request a refund after the duty is finalized — or liquidated — they must file a formal protest and, in some cases, challenge the decision in the New York-based trade court to recover the funds.


Well, fair enough. I stand corrected.

The consumer did pay for it (not "taxpayers", per se) . Tarriffs went up, prices surged, and consumers paid that. Now companies get a refund and probably won't lower prices unless they feel there was extremely adverse effects.

I don't see how the consumer won in any of this.


It's completely irrelevant if the consumer won in any of this.

It's about if the United States is a country that respects the rule of law, or some failed 3rd world state, where the law is only respected if the dear leader likes it.

The first one is much better for economic development


In the lawsuit, no.

But this will only further build up the low trust society when it feels like consumers only lose and never gains any of society's benefits.


Well, their fault for voting Trump.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes


I mean half the voters didn't vote for Trump.

But I guess yes, first past the post is a stupid game.


Those who didn't vote are just as guilty of enabling him

Games are a weird sector. Long term I simply want to go it indie. Even if I doesn't pan out, it's some kind of passive income and I have something to show to that is fully "mine" (so no ambiguity about how much I really contributed at BigCo.).

Short term I'm freelancing and doing whatever else I can find to get by. Hoping for one more full time role before I start my self published ventures.


Depends on the industry and product, as usual. On an large level, I do not think there's "too many engineers and not enough problems to be solved". Companies are simply hunkering down for a recession we can't say out loud.

Overhiring implies that MSFT's headcount went down over this time. But that doesn't seem to be the case. They still hire a lot, just not in North America.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: