> What happens in a court case when this occurs? Does the receiving party get to review and use the redacted information (assuming it’s not gagged by other means) or do they have to immediately report the error and clean room it?

Typically, two copies of a redacted document are submitted via ECF. One is an unredacted but sealed copy that is visible to the judge and all parties to the case. The other is a redacted copy that is visible to the general public.

So, to answer what I believe to be your question: the opposing party in a case would typically have an unredacted copy regardless of whether information is leaked to the general public via improper redaction, so the issue you raise is moot.

"We have documented cases of humans leading normal lives with little to no brain beyond a cerebellum" -- I take this to mean that these are humans that have a cerebellum but not much else.

Your npr.org link talks about the opposite -- regular brain, but no cerebellum.

Your irishtimes.com link talks about cerebrum, which is not the same as cerebellum.

Your biology.stackexchange.com link talks about Cerebral Cortex, which is also not the same as cerebellum.

And the cbc.ca link does not contain the string "cere" on the page.

You're right - I mixed up cerebellum/cerebrum/cortex terminology. My bad. The cases I'm referencing are hydrocephalus patients with severely compressed cerebral tissue who maintained normal cognitive function. The point about structural variation not precluding consciousness stands."

I haven’t heard of Galtonism. From my experience as the colorblind child of native Russian speakers, it’s Daltonism (дальтони́зм).

https://en.openrussian.org/en/colour-blind

Good lord, I had both of their wiki pages open, and STILL somehow D and G were the same letter in my mind.

I should just delete my comment, but let it stand as a monument to my goof.

Perhaps you suffer from D-G letterblindness.

It would be totally understandable for someone who reads handwritten Russian to confuse D and g in their mind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_(Cyrillic)#Form

Oh man, I don't think I've written cursive Russian in something like a decade. I honestly have no idea how Russian historians parse old documents; old hand-written English is hard enough, but cursive Russian is a whole other thing.

My last name just looks like a child drawing a wavy ocean!

He gone doofed.

Lots of cars have mechanical latches that automatically lock when driving over 10mph.

I’ve heard a lot of complaints about the safety of non-mechanical doors. But are these auto-locking mechanical doors any better?

The autolock disengage either 5 seconds after the airbags, or when current is cut. I think autolock feature is mandatory in the EU, as keeping doors close during a crash help with structural integrity.

I've seen such features on business accounts (Wells Fargo ACH Fraud Filter, JPMorgan ACH Debit Block, etc).

What bank allows that on a consumer account?

Probably every EU bank: https://docs.adyen.com/risk-management/chargeback-guidelines...

Mercury's personal banking product allows you to reject ACH transactions before they clear. They also allow you to generate virtual account numbers, so you can easily cut off an entity without having to change your main account number. Unfortunately Mercury charges a monthly fee.

That's pretty cool! I didn't know about that.

For anyone curious, the fee is $240/yr.

I used Mercury when I had an LLC and had a great experience. It feels like they're the only bank that's not 10 years behind in technology. I've never tried their personal banking, but the ACH denial power makes me a lot more curious.

SEPA Direct Debit (the standard way to debit accounts within the SEPA, i.e. roughly "Europe/Eurozone") gives you 8 weeks to revert a debit that you disagree with. Whether a bank exposes this in the UI or not depends on the bank.

Every bank in Germany allows you to dispute transactions done with Debits.

And they make it as difficult and hidden as possible. At the same time they advertise to "support sepa now" as if it's something new while by law they have to process such transactions within two hours for over 10 years now.

At ING it's just a button click. It's directly next to the transaction on their app.

ING is Dutch, not German.

There's also ING in Germany. They are super famous.

They are not called Ing Diba anymore.

Barclay is there now too, London and Amsterdam are taking over.

I use mbank.pl (Poland, EU regulations apply). What do consumers do if they have accounts in banks which don't have this feature in case they want to revoke DD consent?

Probably coincidentally, in a blog post today, Cloudflare announced clientless, browser-based support for RDP. It seems they're using IronRDP under the hood.

https://blog.cloudflare.com/browser-based-rdp/

Cloudflare person who did some of the very early prototyping on this. I posted about our use of IronRDP here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43441709

I would strongly recommend IronRDP, excellent open source project.

I wonder if Cards Against Humanity bid against them.

Depending on the specifics, you might be able to add socat in the middle.

Instead of: your_app —> server

you’d have: your_app -> localhost_socat -> server

socat has command line options for setting tcp_nodelay. You’d need to convince your closed source app to connect to localhost, though. But if it’s doing a dns lookup, you could probably convince it to connect to localhost with an /etc/hosts entry

Since your app would be talking to socat over a local socket, the app’s tcp_nodelay wouldn’t have any effect.

Look up vagal maneuvers. Used by a subset of tachycardia patients to reset to a typical heartbeat.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagal_maneuver

Perhaps a stack of these could be useful as a volumetric display?

I wonder what tricks would be invented to make up to lack of enough layers