Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | itjitj's commentslogin

You're picking a language based on a single library?

Look out, world.


This happens all the time.

If you need to do numerical analysis in a scripting language, you pick python because it has numpy.

I once had to make a QR Code reader and writer back when it was only seen in Japan and the only library available was for Java, so I picked that.

Recently I had some ruby code that parsed a file, but I needed to pump it into a proprietary database with only a JDBC connection... so I picked JRuby.

Often picking a new language is much easier than rewriting a particular library.


Fucking Mission St.


and 19th


-Michael Scott


??


Huh?


What part of the quote are you having trouble understanding, sir?


I think that it would be clearer if there were some examples of nested metaphors or metaphors that 'darken' other metaphors. Maybe there is in the actual text, but the quote out of context seems a little abstract.


Indeed, there are plenty of examples in the text. I didn't think it necessary to paste the entire article in the comment box.

We'll have to agree to disagree.


He didn't say an example was necessary, he said it could have made the quote clearer.


whoosh



Oh, Apple, your transformation is complete.

How long until Apple disbands the senate and declares martial law?


Watch out for Supreme Chancellor Palpatine.


Call the oracle function.


Settle down, Francis.


...you hope.


Yes, and also why the Singularity is such a silly idea.

We are not racing to utopia, we are racing to disaster.


This is not what the word "Singularity" means. See http://yudkowsky.net/singularity/schools.


Think of it. We are blessed with technology that would be indescribable to our forefathers. We have the wherewithal, the know-it-all to feed everybody, clothe everybody, and give every human on Earth a chance. We know now what we could never have known before -- that we now have the option for all humanity to make it successfully on this planet in this lifetime. Whether it is to be Utopia or Oblivion will be a touch-and-go relay race right up to the final moment.

Buckminster Fuller


Unfortunately we have no technology to manage (or enlighten) 6 billion irrational human beings.

EDIT: And so... variations on the Tragedy of the Commons march on.


Do all who believe in the idea of the Singularity think it will be a utopia? I thought most just think it will happen.


I'm rather fond of Charlie Stross's account of a singularity in his book "Accelerando":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerando_%28novel%29

From this I believe that we can predict that a singularity may not be a utopia or a dystopia but it will almost certainly be mind warpingly weird.


I really like Accelerando, too. But it sounds a bit too reasonable; business as usual, with neither Heaven nor Hell.

The human mind accepts better living conditions as self evident really fast and forgets all previous situations. We lack historical insight -- from the viewpoint of two-three centuries ago, we probably live in a good approximation of Heaven.

-- There is no widespread hunger. (Locally, one year in seven had a bad harvest and lots of people died with many children getting brain damage).

-- The child mortality is much less than 20-30%. Enough said.

-- We have antibiotics. We know about cleanliness for operations/childbirth -- and can stop pain during them.

-- We are rich and most everyone can have education, music/art access and only work 8 hours a day.

-- Social equality. Just 160-170 years ago in my country, it became illegal to beat your employees...

-- Modern dental care.

-- Etc.

Even in most of the world's under developed countries, they have it much better than we had just ten generations ago.

Edit: I'm not arguing against "weird". I am arguing that utopia and/or dystopia is more likely than we would guess naively.

Edit 2: To nitpick and give a reference to my last claim (that was irrelevant for my point):

I've seen data for up to 30% children dead before 5 years of age in Scandinavia for poor farmers (that is, most everyone), around 200-250 years ago.

From the reference: "In 2007, there were 37 countries in which at least 10% of children under five died, down from 41 in 2006. All were in Africa, except for Afghanistan."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_mortality#Highest_rates_i...


It's a race between utopia and disaster. And the outcome is likely to be a bit of both. Famines and plagues; and robots on Mars and Titan


Fair enough.


The firehose?

Stanley Spadowski, Internet superstar


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: