If you're curious the linked article has pretty much all the infomation available.
It was written by Alex Wellerstein,
a historian of science and nuclear weapons and a professor at the Stevens Institute of Technology.
who has likely looked over almost all the unclassified US bomb test material, read a substantial amount of it, and at various time has had access to classified portions.
The article has three addendum, updates as more information came to light about the name of dancer, the photographer, the article series that was published, etc.
It's bound to more informative than anything I could tell you given I'm in AU not the US and know somewhat more about Emu Field and the Montebello's than I do about Yucca Flat.
Softbank has literally done this before. Several years ago, Softbank sold it's Nvidia stake and later regretted it to such an extent that Masayoshi Son expressed his feelings by crying. They're only selling Nvidia stock now to fulfill a prior giant cash commitment to OpenAI. Also, Nvidia is positioned to own a sizeable chunk of OpenAI.
You guys that continue to compare DGX Spark to the Mac Studios, please remember two things:
1. Virtually every model that you'd run was developed on Nvidia gear and will run on Spark.
2. Spark has fast-as-hell interconnects. The sort of interconnects that one would want to use in an actual AI DC, so you can use more than one Spark at the same time, and RDMA, and actually start to figure out how things work the way they do and why. You can do a lot with 200 Gb of interconnect.
Also remember that the Mx Ultras have 2-3x the memory bandwidth. Looking at the benchmarks even Strix Halo seems to beat the Spark. Buying a 200 Gbps switch is $10k-$100k+ so don't imagine anyone actually will use the interconnect. The logical thing for Nvidia would be to sell a kit with three machines and cabling, and make it a ring with the dual ports per machine. Helps for some scenarios but not others with the 10 times slower network than memory bandwidth.
On another note to remember, you can also ring topology mac studios using TB5 for 120Gbps per link with four such ports, all using cheaply available cable
Plus it’s a black & white movie, and b&w film has a higher “resolution” than color too right? Because you’re dealing with silver particles instead of physically larger color grains.
Or something like that. Someone more in the know please check my math.
On your dhcp server (probably your router/gateway), statically assign (reserve) the camera's MAC address to the IP that you want it to have. Sometimes called MAC binding.
