Isn't Dokku doing that already?

There are several https://gist.github.com/ptman/1b9e3a992e6c8aeecc86b5f1fd1c5f...

Community compiled list of Heroku alternatives.

https://github.com/debarshibasak/awesome-paas

TypeScript is great, the only bad thing is that it can be a pain to get the configuration right

Little bobby tables they called him

For those who haven't seen/don't recall the xkcd comic - https://xkcd.com/327/

That spanish similarity thing can't be right. Argentina and Uruguay speak basically the same spanish (unless you count dialects like Cordoba)

Argentinian here; yeah it's bullshit, also there's no single "Argentina spanish" or "Spain spanish", Andalusian is very different from Madrilean etc.

I have to say though that Chilean spanish is commonly considered quite hard to understand, they speak really fast with lots of mannerisms and "can't understand a single thing of a Chilean speaking" is a common meme in Argentina at the very least.

Absolute bullshit. Though, I guess it doesn't measure accents idioms. The referenced paper seems to be using this database: https://www.hcias.uni-heidelberg.de/en/research-at-the-hcias...

And even that data is kind of suspect, based on a simple glimpse at the screenshot, which shows idioms for "ISN'T IT?". Colombians definitely would say all of the following, unlike shown in the table:

  A cada quien le va según quiere Dios, ____
  - cierto?
  - no?
  - o no?
  - si o no?

And actually would probably not say "si?" as shown. "Verdad?" might be heard, but maybe an older generation.

It is just bullshit.

From my experience, (Portuguese native speaker who learned Spanish) Colombian Spanish is much easier than Mexican. And the worst Spanish, by far, is from the Dominican Republic. Chile is not that bad, it is quite close to Argentinian, actually.

Spanish my second language and I concur

If you are on Windows, the antivirus might have something to do. It used to be slow for me too but I added an exception and now it's really fast, or at least fast enough so I don't perceive any significant lag.

That's a good idea. It tends to lag when downloading messages.

I like Dan Abramov's "The Wet Codebase" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17KCHwOwgms) -- I've been guilty of doing just what he says in his talk at first, removing all duplications and making the codebase DRY. But then I came to like "prefer duplication over the wrong abstraction", as Sandi Metz puts it.

Sometimes it's good to wait to have more data to make an easier and more informed decision.

Yeah not my thing either, I'd rather see a cheatsheet and a few examples lol

You can't learn a programming language like that, unless it already has very similar paradigms to languages you already know. For example, try to learn APL[1] or Haskell like that (or just assembly if you haven't done any kind of assembly yet).

[1] And that's not just because of the arcane symbols.

I think assembly is probably the one language family you'd find most success learning from a reference sheet.

Once you've been told what a register, a stack, and an addressing mode is (among other details), sure. But then you do know the paradigms already.

But of the languages I mentioned, assembly is certainly the one where the required concepts can be explained quickest, probably by far...

Yeah, sure - as long as that reference sheet is the CPU reference manual.

That was my first though, but a) it seems that the `using` syntax is not exactly the same as in C# (unless the old C# I used to use) and b) still I wouldn't mind, C# is a great language

... for now.

It also makes it very hard for new devs willing to learn Python. Coming from Ruby and JavaScript, you just use bundler or npm, but Python is so strange, even the way it runs files is different, with the module thing.