Yea I don’t like trying to ride the frame work tailwinds, but wow modern hardware with modern nvidia gpu that supports core boot and heads? The only thing missing is a stellar company reputation that inspires trust
Im not an academic but went to fairly prestigious science university (not ivy league or MIT or something like top top tier). I don’t have any experiences to compare it to because I didn’t go to school in other countries.
But haven been through the system and being an American my whole life and understanding America, I would say no I didn’t see anything special about my education.
nothing particularly note worthy and in fact, I have a long list of criticisms. especially tenured professors, professors that don’t speak English very well, and then actually just horrible professors.
Curriculum wise, yes many universities can have fairly cutting edge curriculums but that’s not something we have a monopoly over.
And let’s not talk about the price.
Also, I had quite a few foreign exchange students that I’ve interacted with through throughout the years, whether at school or other places. And more often than not in the cs majors, I would say that they were ahead.
Is It though? You won't get it on an embedded device (maybe) but you could install a thousand of these tools and barely even notice the space being taken up on most machines
I think that’s a lame argument. First because it’s kind of a fallacy. Size is absolute not relative to something. Especially for software. No one thinks of software size primarily in the context of their disk space.
Further I think everyone keeps getting larger and larger memory because software keeps getting more and more bloated.
I remember when 64gb iPhone was more than enough (I don’t take pictures so just apps and data)
Now my 128 is getting uncomfortable due to the os and app sizes. My next phone likely will be a 256
I’m usually the first to complain about bloat but your counterpoints to the GPs “lame arguments” are themselves, fallacies.
> First because it’s kind of a fallacy. Size is absolute not relative to something. Especially for software. No one thinks of software size primarily in the context of their disk space.
That’s exactly how most people think about file sizes.
When your disk is full, you don’t delete the smallest files first. You delete the biggest.
> Further I think everyone keeps getting larger and larger memory because software keeps getting more and more bloated.
RAM sizes have actually stagnated over the last decade.
> I remember when 64gb iPhone was more than enough (I don’t take pictures so just apps and data) Now my 128 is getting uncomfortable due to the os and app sizes. My next phone likely will be a 256
That’s because media sizes increase, not executable sizes.
And people do want higher resolution cameras, higher definition videos, improved audio quality, etc. These are genuinely desirable features.
Couple that with improved internet bandwidth allowing for content providers to push higher bitrate media, however the need to still locally cache media.
200MB apps wouldn’t even make a dent on a 64GB device.
The 2GB apps are usually so large because they include high quality media assets. For example, Spotify will frequently consumer multiple GBs of storage but the vast majority of that is audio cache.
I’m intrigued, how many of them are actual 3rd party apps though? And how many are different layers around an existing app or part of Apple / Googles base OS? The latter, in fairness, consumes several GBs of storage too.
I’m not trying to dismiss your point here. Genuinely curious how you’ve accumulated so many app installs.
It's an interesting question. Some of them are definitely from the OS (either Google or Samsung).
Looking through at categories of app where I have multiple, I'm seeing:
- Transport provider apps (Airlines, Trains, Buses, Taxis etc)
- Parking payment apps
- Food delivery apps
- Hotel apps
- Payment apps
- Messaging / Video calling apps
- Banking apps
- Mapping apps
It's especially easy to accumulate a lot of apps if you travel through multiple countries, as for a lot of these apps you need different ones in different countries.
> No one thinks of software size primarily in the context of their disk space.
This is wrong. The reason why many old tools are so small was because you had far less space. If you have a 20tb harddrive you wouldn't care about whether ls took up 1kb or 2mb, on a 1gb harddrive it matters/ed much more.
Optimization takes time, I'm sure if OP wanted he could shrink the binary size by quite a lot but doing so has its costs and nowadays its rarely worth paying that since nobody even notices wether a program is 2kb or 2mb. It doesn't matter anymore in the age of 1TB bootdrives.
> In an attempt to regain control, Wojcicki made an initial bid in February 2024 to take 23andMe private, offering $2.53 per share in a joint bid, but it did not proceed.[39] In July 2024, Wojcicki offered 40 cents each for all outstanding shares not already owned by her directly or through affiliates.[40] The proposal was rejected by a committee set up to evaluate options for the company's future,[41] and in September the seven independent members of the board of directors all resigned.[42] The company subsequently filed with the SEC indicating that it was no longer open to third-party acquisition offers.[40] Users were concerned about the security of their genetic data, and were trying to delete it from the company's archives only to find out that it holds onto the data for three years before deleting to comply with "legal obligations".[43]
> In January 2025, 23andMe declared that it would need additional liquidity to fund operations, and was actively exploring strategic alternatives including a potential sale of the company.[45] Wojcicki made a third offer of 41 cents per share in March 2025.[39]
-------------
I don't know a lot about her, but she co-founded 23andme and has been tied to it ever since. Maybe it's her baby?
Indeed I'm using a Librem laptop with Pureboot. Librem 14v1 has been discontinued, Purism is developing the second version, hopefully with a newer CPU.
Idk but it was under trump. And the meta issue was balancing the budget after all his tax cuts so he needed to find more tax revenues. Which this accomplishes pretty handily
I think partially dismissing the question due to the bill happening "under trump" doesn't help the conversation here. If the bill was sponsored by particular reps/senators, then it's worth identifying those, so their voters can factor this bill in to their decision to vote for/against in the future, etc.
Any details on how you managed to scrape the all mighty goog?