In some ways it is an interesting problem about whether someone can engage a question about a hypothetic question -- and for the purpose of the exercise, assume the proposed parameters of the scenario.

the web page is offensive to the eyes, I closed it immediately

done https://autopsy.cloud/

on it will update soon. thanks

interesting, I see his preference is some kind of slavering radical antisocial screed whereas yours is the universal desire of all of society

Kinda?

> In summer 2019, the Province conducted a public engagement on time observance that saw participation from a record 223,000 people, with 93% supporting adopting year-round DST. Similarly, across all industry groups and nearly all occupational groups, support for year-round DST observance was higher than 90%.

I can do you one better. I can represent the largest number with a single binary bit.

I can do it in half a bit

Slow down there mr zip file

increase the border size. more. yes. in the bloodiest red. yes. its rectangle time

huh.. seems like a head-scratcher why it would relevant to this argument to select objectionable words instead of benign, inert words.

right, but the productivity boost provides further leverage

Seems you are arguing that The Tragedy Of The Commons could never happen because people benefit from the Commons

also on the frontpage: new YC homepage celebrating palantir

I assume the same as if the car owner put a brick on the gas pedal and there was no driver when it had an accident

Found the Chief Legal Officer for Waymo

Okay but what if I install servos and ask Claude Code to operate the vehicle for me?