Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | faangsticle's commentslogin

Other way around. Cli params have highest precedence.


According to the comment above, `cmd -u my_special_user` will only use the value "my_special_user" if none of the other 21 places have another configuration for the user, right?


And CLI params override everything, globally.


You don't have to be an expert to read multiple files. If you do need expert assistance with something like that please contact me and we can work something out.


The "expertise" is in finding those files and understanding their hierarchy


Sure, you could also just go to a supermarket. If you don't know what to expect, why risk it?


It was how restaurants worked for a long time. Of course, if you prefer the predictability of seeing the menu before you get there, that’s your preference, fair enough. But I wonder if you might miss out on some places run by cooks who put all their talent into cooking, and none into technology. Could be some good stuff…


Talent isn’t a zero sum game.

It takes next to no effort to throw your menu as a photo on google maps for example.


Example of how this falls apart: you change your prices. You change your menu. You have different menus for different times of day. You have different menus for special occasions.


Good point. Also, once the customer is accessing the menu through their smartphone, modern ad tracking technologies also enable pricing to match the expected buying power of the customer. This way the hospitality industry and their adtech partners can extract more value from the transaction and thus increase the efficiency of the market.


AFIAK those pictures-of-menus don't come from the restaurant owner, but from the people dining there. I believe they're partly scraped from restaurant review sites like Zomato (where the pictures-of-menus are interspersed with pictures-of-the-food-itself) and partly the result of Google doing Google Lens things to your Google Photos to figure out that you took photos while inside a restaurant, and then asking you if it can use them.


It would be nice if the technology people would stop expecting everyone to cater to them.


You mean market forces that pushes the companies that make their business less accessible?

I personally don’t expect anything. I’ll just not go to places that don’t have information. That’s the market in action.


Market forces are made of people. You can't just abdicate responsibility for your actions by saying "I'm making financial actions, therefore it's the invisible hand doing it, woooo!".


That would not have occurred to me as a thing to do. It takes non-zero effort to think of these things in the first place.


Every business needs marketing, even the most basic coffee shop. Maintaining an online presence is just part of running a modern business.

You’re free to not do it, but the market will push you out in favor of businesses that do.


It's not that big of a risk to be honest. People did it all the time before the internet. Some people are not pathologically risk adverse and might even enjoy being surprised.


risk averse


Humans aren't computer programs, for one.


Any of them unless the company who produced it can prove they behaved and only slurped up data they have the rights to.


People say lots of things, especially when they see ways to exploit others so they can make money. Let this be a reminder that copyright exists to protect the rich, not the artists.


Of course it will, since you'll either get the commit you wanted at the time you wrote the script, or an error.


Unless someone is very good at finding SHA1 collisions.


The collisions need to deliver malicious payload as well, making it extra hard


Those are still very hard to get for a random hash, and GitHub I think warns (or blocks?) you if you try to push a hash with a known vulnerability.


I guess you don't use electricity either because of logging and coal mining. What about the internet and all those resources needed for the data centra?


Those who abstain from activities that are cruel to animals avoid those things, indeed. Of course we won't hear from them here, for obvious reasons.


Right, so obviously you're not one of them. No need to virtue signal.


Nobody here is. There is no possibility to virtue signal in this case as the audience will never see it.

Sorry that I let out your little secret that animals are harmed in the process of resource extraction. I don't think it was ever much of a secret, though.


No because it doesn't exist anywhere on a large enough scale yet.


I highly recommend watching this: https://www.southparkstudios.com/video-clips/mqk1s7/south-pa...

Or more recently, the Black Mirror episode Joan is Awful


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: