Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | evancharles's commentslogin

"Threads is a Slack replacement designed for makers," from https://www.linkedin.com/company/threadsgroupinc/


Is it a pun, hinting that Slack is for slackers?


"... and made by makers!"


If they were bought by a bread company, they would have been bade by bakers.


Faked by fakers or created by creators.. hahaha


Tautology


Is it even a tautology if it's the same word being reused?


The Tau of Tautology.

It's Taus all the way down!


I thought it was Tautols all the way down.


By designers, rather.


You're going to get a ton of skepticism, but I think it's possible in a dense area to find enough people who have enough overlap in the staples they consume who are willing to pay for this. I would try to focus on quality first, proving that you can get super high customer retention and unit margin, before trying to be cost-competitive with a larger grocer.


I am involved with a company called Teamshares that helps small businesses convert to employee ownership. A big part of what makes it work is exposing company financials to all employees in a way that helps connect one's actions with financial performance.

We are hiring software engineers, in case anyone is curious. https://www.teamshares.com/careers


The funny thing is this is more functional (and took longer to create) than the first version of DoorDash.


Entering the working world does not mean you have to give up diving deeply into new topics!


Our real estate and land markets seem hyper fragmented, not close to being a monopoly? Maybe I'm misunderstanding.


They are only fragmented at first glance. Upon a closer look, there are organizations like the Association of Bay Area Governments, and of course all kinds of unofficial meetings and shared information sources that keep people on the same page.

Similar to how "salary surveys" are "not collusion" among the big employers, even though they're used to effectively fix the price of employee salaries to certain ranges and treat that as some sort of natural barrier like a mountain range that can't be overcome.


When I've seen founders try to keep investors at arms length it seems to result in mistrust, leaving investors feeling like they can't get the real story, and thus decreasing the likelihood they invest further. So rather than keeping insiders at arms length, I'd suggest being direct about wanting to meet other investors. I suggest uncomfortable candor over comfortable misdirection.


My guess is he means that VCs don't make decisions out of friendship.


That is what I meant. Totally agree it wasn't my best turn of phrase. Worked in my head!


I thought it was pretty clever!


thx so much for showing an example, very helpful. btw, if I may, it might be nicer to stick to just serif or sans-serif fonts in your deck, the mix is making my eyes a little sad.


Oh wow. Didn't see that. I told you I'm bad at it lol.

But thx a lot! Will do that.


One trick to catch opportunists: start with those looking to increase their headcount faster than baseline (as any good opportunist will attempt), and then see if they will adopt an opposing logical argument as long as it leads to the conclusion that their headcount should grow.

This is a flavor of looking for those who make different arguments depending on the audience, which in general is a helpful warning signal.

Although it's impossible to entirely route out opportunists at a high quality, quickly growing company, as the author notes, I still find it is worthwhile to maximize the number of leaders in your company whom you trust to make arguments in the service of making the business work.


I don't thinks who someone who thinks they can get more done with more people is being "opportunitist".


I agree, but the opportunists are within that set


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: