One of the key issues founders are struggling with is co-founder conflict. According to Noam Wasserman, more than 65% of startups fail because of this problem.
Over the past year, my 3 friends and I worked on the Co-founder’s Daily Journal. It is a daily journal where for just 5 minutes a day, co-founders can come together (physically or online), answer a few simple questions, and work on improving their relationship.
Today, we’re launching on Product Hunt and would love for you to head over there and share your love by upvoting our product, or if you’re facing this problem yourself, go ahead and purchase the journal for yourself and your co-founder(s). It’s never too late to start a conversation, and figure out what’s wrong and how to fix it.
we had to go into a temporary maintenance mode right now, because we had too much load and we weren’t ready for it. We'll update you as soon as we're up and running again.
Btw, I'm reading all the feedback, and it's highly appreciated!
Is this why the entire site is not working? I’m just getting a blank screen once I run it in a JavaScript-enabled environment (without which I get “You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.”).
The term “maintenance mode” specifically implies an orderly disablement. I expect anything it applies to to receive some sort of message as to what’s going on if you try to use it.
Unless otherwise specified, I assume that it will be applying to an app, but not to a marketing website—because these are almost always treated as separate things, and shifting the app into maintenance mode doesn’t take down the marketing site (even if it’s on the same infrastructure).
What I observe is that the marketing site part (presuming I’m right about it being marketing site—I still haven’t seen the page) seems to all be there and responding fine, loading its unreasonably large megabytes of JavaScript rather than just serving plain sensible HTML, but that it doesn’t actually render anything. There are no JavaScript errors in the console; the only potential hint is that it’s getting a 503 from wss://everchat-server.herokuapp.com. But is that the cause? It’s not at all normal for a marketing site to break if a WebSocket connection fails. What’s it trying to do? I have no idea. So I give up and ask. :-)
If trying to take down the entire thing, I’d hope for all requests to the website to yield a 503 response with some kind of “Everchat got overloaded, be back in a day or two” simple HTML response.
> "Home should say what is everchat, features, differentiating factors."
Will add this to our backlog. We're getting this request a lot!
> "Peek into "popular channels" without login."
Same as the above
> "Sign up email comes from a random firebase domain, not the same as the welcome."
Yeah we know about this, we requested a custom domain but Google is taking its time :D
> "Haven't managed to post a comment, getting 500 on a `s?l=dataLayer` resource (chrome macOS)."
Don't really know what's going on here, but will look into it.
> "Ability to enable notifications (email and/or html5) on specific channels."
Great idea!!!
> "A monthly or so email about new features, stats, or changes would be nice. I don't think I'd use it right now but if it managed to get traction I'd be up for it."
Monthly email update is setup :)
> "Maybe: Invite only rooms? Discord style."
Private channels that are accessible only for people with a token are on our roadmap. :)
You brought up very good points and yes, we are concerned with the same problem you're bringin up. In the future, we want communities to self-police themselves, but for that, people on Everchat need adequate tools, which we haven't even start building yet.
The issue of non-responsivity became apparent when someone (2 hours into launch) tried to crash the site with the unlimited title length :D This should already be hotfixed, so the waiting times shouldn't be that long! :)
How will you prevent the site turning into another Voat / image board? Or will you embrace being a home to that type of content? They are happy to police themselves, but the result of that policing is of course representative of the most extremely racist and horrid views as they are not accepted elsewhere. And most people won't want to be associated with such content, so they will avoid the site.
Thanks for the feedback! Yes, we're looking into this usecase. We're planning to create private communities, where only people with token have access to. And later on, expand on the concept of threading. How does that sound?