Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | efraim's commentslogin

I have them separated in firefox because i find it superior.


Me too. I search through both URL bar and search bar, and sometimes I use the search bar as a scratchpad of sorts – very convenient IMO.


Agreed. When I go to modify my searches after clicking through a few pages and realizing I'm not getting what I need, I don't have to hit back n times until I get back to the search.

The alternative would be always opening search results in a new tab until I find what I'm looking for, but I don't need more tab clutter.


I have it too, but unfortunately this only gives you two search boxes, behavior of the url bar doesn't change.


I'm pretty sure that you can fully disable search in the URL bar by changing 'browser.fixup.alternate.enabled' to false


> Today, Spotify has a 56 percent share of Europe’s music streaming market — more than double their closest competitor’s — and pays Apple nothing for the services that have helped make them one of the most recognizable brands in the world.

And they shouldn't have to, users should be able to install whatever software they want on their devices without paying a gatekeeper for it. Spotify exists on the web as well, they don't have to pay Google or Mozilla for delivering the service to their users. They don't have to pay Microsoft when users downloads and installs desktop software for windows. So why should Apple get any money because users install Spotify on their iphones? I'm sure Spotify pays Google for their cloud services that actually helps make them successful.


> they don't have to pay Google or Mozilla for delivering the service to their users.

Spotify has a secret deal with Google:

https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/20/23969690/google-spotify-...


The report by the whistleblower David Lochridge is specifically about Cyclops 2, also called Titan, and the quality control of the carbon fiber cylinder. It also mentions the viewport only being certified to 1300 meters. Some of it can be read in the lawsuit that came from Oceangate firing David.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.26...


Why is it ok to be prescriptive with things like spelling of words but not grammar or the meaning of words? If people are using words in a way that doesn't make sense to the reader, such as changing the meaning of them to be the opposite like the word factoid, it's not the reader that is wrong by pointing out that the word has a different meaning than intended. I have no problem calling out such use as being wrong.


> Why is it ok to be prescriptive with things like spelling of words but not grammar or the meaning of words?

It's not.

> If people are using words in a way that doesn't make sense to the reader, such as changing the meaning of them to be the opposite like the word factoid, it's not the reader that is wrong by pointing out that the word has a different meaning than intended.

The reader can say "It was unclear", "I didn't like it", or "that seems like it's opposite to what I would expect", but "wrong" is a silly thing to say. None of these things are even absolute within published English literature, let alone just say American, or UK, English literature. Even if you're following a particular style manual things are ambiguous in many cases.


Your source doesn't seem accurate. Swedish immigration has been decreasing for the last 7 years, it is now back at the same level as 2012 but it was increasing every year since the mid 90s before that at was at its peak in 2016.

https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/statistics-by-subje...


And now that the main channel is down they have moved on to Techquickie. edit: and TechLinked


If it's a guide maybe you should mention that the original ESP32 is still for sale and still faster than some of the newer alternatives. There is also a new faster risc-v based variant without wifi/bt that was recently presented called ESP32-P4.

All current variants: https://www.espressif.com/en/products/socs


What use case does the ESP32 have?

Wouldn't it be better to just recommend the S3, where there is currently only one version available?

There are like a dozen different versions for the ESP32.

"Two or one CPU core(s) with adjustable clock frequency, ranging from 80 MHz to 240 MHz"

In this case it seems to be the better choice to just use the ESP-S3 with better encryption support and support for Cameras.


There are many different boards with ESP32 on them and lots of old projects that use it. The extra speed and features of the S3 is often not needed, so the cheaper ESP32 is a good option. And they both support cameras. https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/stable/esp32s... https://github.com/espressif/esp32-camera


Some projects don't work with the newer boards (wled for example).

Partly this is because the Esp sdks aren't as mature for the newer boards. This is very true for the brand new C6 series, but somewhat true for th S3 and C3 lines as well


You don’t always need the fastest CPUs and the richest peripheral set. Those things are detrimental when you need to save power.


In that case it's better to tip with the card so the money is taxed correctly. Taxes are necessary and everyone involved in providing the service should have a cut of the tip.


In a follow up tweet it looks like there was a leaf on a tree in the foreground that obscured her face, not an AI replacement.


You're off by one in the initial seed step. Change

for (let i = seedSteps + s.length; i >= seedSteps; i--) to for (let i = seedSteps + s.length - 1; i >= seedSteps; i--)

The original is not using the for loop in the usual way so i starts off one smaller than expected.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: