Can be incrementally improved by using a more human-focused color model than HSV, like CIECAM02 or CIELAB.

That’s intentional in the US, otherwise people would sell votes or get coerced to vote.

Washington state is fighting it:

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/washington-gov-jay...

Washington state will act under our own authority and under our own laws and under our own jurisdiction to protect the very important measure of net neutrality for all Washington citizens,” he said. “We are not powerless.

It'll be interesting to see how that goes, whether other progressive states adopt similar rules, and whether we end up for some time in a country where some states are much more attractive to internet users and startups.

You can exclude bin directories from Defender: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4028485/windows-10-...

I'm excited by the specs, especially given that Red Dead Redemption 2, Battlefront 2, Call of Duty WW2, and Destiny 2 are all hitting this holiday. Should be the best way to play those games.

Although I wish they had more unique games coming out alongside that stuff. Playing Zelda on Switch is a good reminder that eye candy doesn't matter all that much after the novelty wears off.

On paper it's incrementally better--significantly higher clocks, more RAM and much more memory bandwidth. But the bigger news is that all existing Xbox One games get 16x anisotropic filtering, framerate boosts, v-sync, and resolution bumps (if the game supports dynamic resolution). Not to mention system-wide downsampling for 1080p TV's.

Should be a pretty big bump in image quality for Xbox One games. They demoed Forza running at 4k/60 FPS with PC Ultra-equivalent settings at less than 90% GPU load.

Not sure why but some of your previous comments are showing up [dead] in the threads.

Replying to the dead comment below, his post history looks great to me, which is why I felt compelled to point out the dead flag.

OT, but I'll keep it short, and the user should now it is okay now: you are right. I vouched for the comment in this thread and that seems to have helped.

Looking at the history, it's probably the anti-trump comment that got flagged.

I'm not an economist, but from what I've read, running a trade deficit isn't necessarily a bad thing. The US ran trade deficits through the 80's and 90's while the economy was booming.

And there is never a good time for war between two nuclear powers.

Trump explicitly called for a Muslim ban during the campaign. Rudy Guiliani is on camera saying that this EO was drafted as a legal way to implement a Muslim ban.

I am not a lawyer, but is seems like it should be illegal to deny refugees or immigrants based on religion.