Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | diydsp's commentslogin

1. The article points out Claude has resisted being trained for that. AI in general could, but Claude can not.


I think the biggest problem is whether Claude could be tricked into doing so. I could see how mass surveillance could be repacked as "summarize my conversations", or autonomous killbots could be playing a video game.


Why is Elon Musk a free man?

We have a publicly verifiable history of repeated violations that would put any American away for a long time.


POSIWID perspective: a[1] purpose of wealth is if you have a billion dollars, you are exempt from rule of law.

1. of course there are more


What specifically? I suspect it's just stuff you're angry at because of excess social media consumption, not actual crimes that have long prison sentences applied to typical perpetrators.



Initiated intimate relationships with female employees? God. That's not only perfectly legal, but it's also how normal people often start relationships. The other stuff is all either legal or denied by Musk and lacks any other substance beyond somebody making the claim. People do just make up accusations to slander people, you know?


Their soft power is being cashed in for the benefit of an oligarchy.


My favorite recent oddity:

I was driven to the store, so I drove to the store. The store drove me there.

My passenger was driven to the store so he asked me to drive him to the store. So since the store was driving us to the store, I drove us to the store. We've become good friends since he was driven to the store. I'm glad the store drove us to the store.

Even though I usually prefer to drive cattle.


Ah so with splites you can have a 24 pix wide column of arbitrary data that can be slid around left to right....and may act as an "echo" of the players movement like in this game...or possibly even different physics...

I love the stacking of boolean ops before branches, too.


Im guessing certain gym rats who also dont desk/computer work?


I would strongly bet against gym rats not having some shoulder abnormality. If anything, I'd expect them to have more issues with their tendons and ligaments.


I'd bet they probably have some abnormality too, but I don't think I'd expect them to have more issues. There's a lot talked about people getting injured in the gym, but people get injured a lot outside the gym, just for some reason people really fixate on in the gym injuries.

There's lots of research that indicates that frequent strength training significantly reduces your risk of injury in day to day activities, especially later in life. If I can deadlift 500 pounds, I'm not going to get injured lifting 100 pounds, but your general population could. If I've got 3 inches of muscle around my hips and increased bone density from resistance training, I'm not going to break my hip when I trip.

"Strong people are harder to kill" -Mark Rippetoe


Training reduces your risk of injury as long as you don't overtrain. Overtraining increases your risk of injury, but the injuries you sustain are training-related. For example you can really mess up your knees by running more than your body can handle or by running without warming up and stretching first. But the kind of injury you get is different from messing your knees up by falling over.


yeah. and joints, especially. I lost some wrist mobility during my boxing years and it never came back, even though I was in my early 20's when I had quit.


Why didn’t you wrap up


wraps won't save your knuckles/wrists/elbows from the damage caused by repeated high-force impacts, and the cartilage only has to heal wrong once for a lifetime of mild discomfort.


I mean, boxing is, by design, much more violent and higher impact than most other gym exercises.


More likely someone who's been in a coma for the last ten years.


They'd probably have to specifically focus on mobility and flexibility as well. You really need both of those in conjunction with enough strength.


Gymnasts are known to have very worn out shoulders which can be seen in scans. Eg at ~25yo they have shoulders of a ~40 to 50 year old person.


If I had children I would never let them do gymnastics seriously.


Yes in one sense, but it also points to the insufficency of "normalness". See also: The Average Soldier.


There’s a famous case study in design about the Average Pilot - they were making airplanes than nobody could fly well because nobody was average enough in all physical dimensions to be comfortable in the aircraft. They had to design for ranges that the equipment could adjust through.

Even then when I was a kid I knew a guy who wanted to join the air force and he had a growth spurt that made him too tall.


More of the history of "avenge pilots" here: https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/on-average/


> Daniels realized that none of the pilots he measured was average on all ten dimensions. Not a single one. When he looked at just three dimensions, less than five percent were average. Daniels realized that by designing something for an average pilot, it was literally designed to fit nobody.


1. Foreign state actors

2. Inter-hostile agencies within the u.s.


Its some what natural to german spkrs who use a special set of double quotes to start a quote in print.


Ive done a lot of analysis on the Trump as Putin agent topic. I found he nearly as often acts agents Russia as with. What's more likely is he treats Putin as an inspiration, wrt to converting the country to an oligarchy and offshoring national funds for himself.


Yeah. The idea that he's a Russian asset, although tempting, has always seemed to me like a coping mechanism of sorts – externalizing the evil, like blaming the devil for one's bad deeds.

And, of course, Hanlon's razor is very much relevant here, although certainly it doesn't apply to everybody in Trump's inner circle. Some of them are very much competent and malevolent.


Why not both?


I found Vlad Vexler’s take interesting. Trump has a narcissistic personality disorder. Not a narcissistic trait that many elites have, but an actual disorder. He looks up to Putin and wants to bask in Putin’s glory to elevate himself.

[1] https://open.substack.com/pub/vladvexler/p/we-need-to-talk-a...


*acts against


is the acting against Russia and against American interest, in a way that helps Russian interests, of equivocal effect?

For example if I shoot Batman in the back when he's fighting The Joker (because Batman is a vigilante so that's illegal, gotta take him down), and later make a statement to the press after Joker has been sent to Arkham "You know I think Arkham is a good place for that guy, he got what he deserved", I have acted for and against The Joker's interest, which is a good cover for me as an agent of The Joker.

I have often seen Trump doing stuff that is counter Russia's interests, but stuff that seems extremely weak sauce in contrast to weakening Nato, as just one example. It is spycraft 101 that you give your assets some simple stuff they can do against you, to make them seem trustworthy.


Curious. Can you name a few instances where he intentionally acted against Russia and did not just throw around words without following them up?


He is an equal opportunity a-hole, though my personal feeling is that he looks up to Putin, and wants to be like him

Some things he has done that Putin is probably not fond of:

Javelins in his first term, I believe that was the time the us supplied military weapons to Ukraine. These weapons made a big impact during the invasion

Tried to get Europe off of Russia gas, making very public warnings about depending on Russia. This was first term

Tried to get Europe to invest heavily in thru military, first and second term

Syria, Iran and Venezuela, all allies of Russia, especially Iran for military technology and Venezuela as part of its shadow fleet.

Sanctions


Strongly disagree. If you look into the details, you'll find he never actually intentionally hurt Russia.

>Javelins in his first term, I believe that was the time the us supplied military weapons to Ukraine.

Trump was always reluctant about it and actually got himself into yet another impeachment inquiry for withholding part of this congressional aid package, because Zelenskyy did not want to investigate Hunter Biden. He wasn't able to overcome congress, but he did manage to limit Javelin use for western Ukraine only, were Russia was not active back then.

>Tried to get Europe off of Russia gas

That goes into the aforementioned category of things he said but never acted on. Russia caused Europe to actually move away from Russian gas in the end.

>Tried to get Europe to invest heavily in thru military

Same category and same answer. Could also be seen as his start of dismantling NATO from the inside, which seems to have been his (and ofc. Putin's) ultimate goal from the very beginning - which in turn dates back all the way to the 1980s, when Trump bought anti-NATO advertising in the New York Times after visiting Russia. So it's not even that far fetched to accuse him (or his handlers) of long term schemes.

>Syria

The US had troops there for a veeeery long time, but rarely threw hands with the regime under any US admin. After all, this was mostly about curbing IS. Putin apparently never really cared about Syria in the end either. They were just an alternate location for a warm water Navy port to them, which became obsolete once they took over Crimea. Assad got to feel that pretty hard.

>Iran

They were allied, but Iran actually started going against Russia in 2023 because Putin supported the UAE claim on the Strait of Hormuz. It's all been downhill since then and the eventual US military strike was definitely pro-Israel, not anti-Russia.

>and Venezuela

They literally halted the immediate seizure after one of those "shadow fleet" ships suddenly displayed a Russian Flag. This was always more about hurting Venezuela and they explicitly tried to handle Russia with appeasement.

>Sanctions

Not sure what you mean here. Safe for one pointless act on oil companies that were already heavily sanctioned, all relevant sanctions came under the Biden admin. He famously did not put tariffs on Russia, despite putting them on basically every other country in the world (allied or not).


Wrong. Never actually acts against Putin interests. Blusters a bit, for sure, but never acts.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: