Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cyansmoker's commentslogin

My thoughts exactly. This title is needlessly editorializing.


Thanks for that!

Yeah their static site generator seems to be a bit deficient.


dude literally has a BUNCH of repos I want to explore, now.


The problem I see with this is: no-one is born a senior developer. One starts as a junior-level dev, and through trial and error, mistakes and mentoring, grow into an increasingly senior person. You are not just investing into a person who will leave; you are investing in your future senior devs.


`gogo` get it right :)


This is so funny and also a commentary on my inability to perform searches in github I guess.

A month ago I was looking for something like this, so I created https://github.com/fusion/gogo

Now this thread is revealing an abundance of alternate tools.

I'm considering creating a "list of fetching tools" just to help folks find the one they want, since some features described here are very interesting.


Hi @vitpro2213 it's very interesting (at least to me) to find about this data structure a few months after I had a need for its somewhat distant cousin: https://github.com/Fusion/slotmachine

In my case, I needed a way to book and release two-ports tuples really fast to accommodate a RTP simulator. So, I wrote that slotmachine data structure and have been running in in production for months and can confirm: yes, performance is good.

Note: I should mention that my approach is almost exactly opposite to yours: I create a final backing slice, then create the traversal slices.


Will have a look at it, thanks


Related, to make the CueCat "speak English:" https://nexus.zteo.com/posts/sunday-hacking-cuecat-delicious...


I use SIPGO in a simulator I wrote for my work. With this and GoRTP (heavily patched) it handles 2000+ CPS, with media.

So... yeah. Well done!


Great to hear. I would also like to share this in some way. Maybe is not opensourced but it would great to have your benchmark attached on project


It's a UI builder, not a set of components.

But you're right that they built a pretty ugly landing page. Especially the color palette and fonts selection. I don' think this should detract from the service offered, so I hope they fix this quick.


> It's a UI builder, not a set of components.

I think it's UI builder that has predefined set of components that user can customise - globally (by customising 'theme' - font family, primary colors etc) or per component (padding, margins, overwriting theme settings). From these components user creates pages/templates. User can create there own components if they want so that's good.

Bu OP doesn't show those predefined components even as images, ever more there's no information how many components there are. And predefined components are important feature of most web builders as they can save a lot of time. Also well designed components (good color scheme, typography, spacing) helps develovers without design skills.


You are right that I need to just do a WAY better job of showing the product on the home page.

I honestly just needed to get this out to the world so I can hear comments like these to make sure I am focusing on the right things!

Thank you for the comments!!


There is a lot of subjectivity into what makes a great landing page but I am sure you are right that the current version can be improved.

Thank you for the feedback!!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: