You appear to be exactly the kind of person the article is talking about. What exactly makes LLMs have "better" opinions than others?

All American companies pay taxes to America which is basically always commiting atrocities so I don't think that's a strogn enough reason on its own.

Isn't there evidence for neurotypicals only _thinking_ they are focussing better and actually not? Also note that this 'high' you are talking about would likely only apply at higher doses than ADHDers actually get.

I think the comparison was more based on the rooster approaching when they werent looking and stopping when they were. I can't recall any other monsters that do that.

Indeed, this is the part of the behavior I was referring to :) It's a good point about the speed though - not the perfect analogy.

Cats.

I have grown up on a purely vegetarian diet since I was born and I don't have any health problems from that. I know anecdotal evidence is usually not great and I will admit it is harder to maintain a healthy diet whilst vegetarian (but not too much), in this case it surely cannot be true that you can't live on a vegetarian diet without any bad consequences if I have done that?

probably because when humans pay full attention and think clearly they can not hallucinate for 99% of things they can sense (disregarfing optical illusion), but there is no 'pay attention and dont hallucinate' switch for LLMs.

People are bullshitting just the same about topics they know nothing about. They often also won't shut about when others tell them and even when they themselves know that they know nothing. To some extent this is necessary for humans to function at all, and the scientific process starts out from uneducated guesses and rigorously refines them and casts away what doesn't hold up to empiric data.

Optical illusions are evidence of the pile of hacks that our senses and our consciousness use to make sense of the world. I think it is really difficult to fully disengage from the biases this induces, and we are sadly best at perceiving such flaws in others. This might be one of the reasons why humans have to socialize with other humans to maintain mental health.

I think amount of is usually used for 'continuous' (I'm not sure on the word) substances like flour, water, or salt, rather than multiples of discreet objects.

I can also have:

Just the right amount of cats Just the right amount of internet points Just the right amount of chutzpah

Implying chutzpah is a discrete variable, and chutzpah is never discreet

It says because of the airflow from the engine it could be punctured by up to 6 .30 calibre bullets and maintain pressure. Is this enough resilience? (I don't really know about aircraft combat)

So it's a flying bouncy castle or flying tube man. Makes sense. Imagine it would be extra fun if there were an inflatable Fokker Dr.I.

noting I have been recommended doas as a more lightweight version of sudo so other people are trying to do this kind of thing

isn't this ungoogled chromium? Or base chromium?