Something like Cryptomator (https://cryptomator.org/)

“Oh I didn’t study at all for this test” - heard a thousand times, never true in my opinion. Maybe you are just more honest with yourself.

if some color and additional hints is all you need, this may be a competitor:

alias ll='ls -lahF --color=auto'

This is the first alias I create on any os I use daily.

Although I order the switches as `halF` as it's easier to remember for quick one-off use on servers (and containers). It's practically muscle memory for me now.

I must be one of the few, but I rarely like color output. And then some throw in underline or bold, but in e.g. ls (or exa) almost none of the make-up adds information, yet everything shouts for attention. I turn most of it off, rather than on.

Or maybe just read/bookmark this single post: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1218390/what-is-your-mos...

That’s neat. Inspired me to give it another go. Thanks

I would disagree for the first part: Review usually does not happen during paid hours or is even somehow formally accredited by universities.

At my university, reviewing is explicitly mentioned to be on your own time: we cannot write any hours for it.

That honestly seems like a bigger problem, if researchers are not paid for reviewing who will do it?

My experience is that reviewers do this as part of their duties and takes place during work hours.

Universities pay you for teaching and researching. Reviewing is part of the researching.

learnxinyminutes.com