Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | catseyechandra's commentslogin

RPC done right!


About the therapy, use it to identify black spots, traces of vicious circle(s) in your life. About love, everything has been said by everybody.


A SSRI, a bit of walk, eating vegetables and fruits, friendship, and thinking about what you wanted to do when you were 15? Love, it come and go, come, go, come softer, go softer, over time :) At 28 it is sometimes hard to accept, but it's a network of neurons that needs to adjust it's weight over time, even if it's thru (a lot) of pain. And what about tomorrow, you'll rarely can tell for sure!


This is good, but switzerland tend to spread this kind of news to build a very progressive image, things inside of switzerland is a bit different, i.e. this swiss intel/security hiccup: https://www.strauss-engineering.ch/posts/sevices.html (in french).


Economical warfare as dumb as CIA activities in Europe. 20 years of my life destroyed. A 5mio US$ affair on one single individual.


I'm both an IT and audio geek, does HN likes audio geekery? I'm not affiliated with the company behind this website BTW..


> does HN likes audio geekery

Only if scientifically backed.


Hahaha! I can't imagine discussing the finer points of optimization on here.

"the electromagnetic signal of course rides half outside the wire in a world increasingly filled with RF/EMF noise. Be sure to keep your cables off the floor or there WILL be impedence changes. Also, the Frequency Response is largely not relevant as 95+% of audiophiles don't have effective bass traps or ways to remove excess energy from the room. Intelligibility is the better metric, and no one uses it because it requires bass trapping and that's just to ugly and expensive."

Are you ready to rip my head off yet for all these largely unknown but completely true scientific facts? :)


Of course science would also require a blind perception test ...


When talking about high-end audio it is more of The Science™ than about the scientific method. The former is also far more profitable so it is not surprising to find so little of the latter in this field.


For audio geek who wants a high quality audio extraction from their CD collection


Why would I use this over abcde, another cdparanoia frontend that is packaged for every major distro?


My understanding is whipper is more paranoid than abcde. whipper does a couple things to ensure a perfect rip:

* Rips tracks twice and ensures the checksums match (retrying if they do not)

* Compares the track checksums against the AccurateRip database

I think this gives much more confidence that the result is correct. The tags seem a lot more detailed with whipper too.


What I appreciated most about 'abcde' was that just prior to the rip it would open up the CDDB output in 'vim' and allow quick and easy edits to what are, sometimes, horrific titling and track entries ...

It's a very nice workflow and avoids a lot of cleanup ...


I second this question. I've used both before; the user experience is basically the same, and there's no audible difference between the two.


Thank you Chat GPT


Fyi this is just the OP adding a description


I have noticed a lot of super low-effort comments like this recently. They typically don't even write as well as current-gen chatbots.


C++ 20! A good step forward, this iteration of C++.


Very heavy element in the atmosphere of an exoplanet


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: