Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bcostlow's commentslogin

I'm not the original person you are asking, but over a 27 year career in IT, I've worked from home for 17 of them.

Here's how I stayed social. First, I used the time you would spend commuting or going out to lunch to get non-work chores done. I'd do laundry in the morning when I'd otherwise be in the car. I cut the grass or worked out during lunch, etc. I'd already be fixing dinner during everyone else's evening drive time.

That freed up my weekday evenings to be social, since I wasn't in after work commute-cook-chores hell.

I'd spend time at programming language groups; taking classes related to hobbies (brewing, a little woodworking); going out with friends to nice restaurants on Wednesdays when they weren't crowded; and doing some social volunteering. I got involved in running a couple of software conferences and joined a wine-and-movies social club.

I found—since I am a "gregarious introvert"—that not having to be around coworkers all day left me more energized to socialize with friends and family in the evenings.

And instead of a social circle dominated by coworkers, I have one that provides interactions with people from all walks of life, and have friends scattered around the globe to visit when I retire.

If you plan well and work at it, you can be more social working from home.


Most PACS get data from devices and send it to workstations unencrypted. The security model implemented on them is usually no more than a white list of IP addresses the PACS will talk to. (To be fair, many of the servers have better security available now, but hospitals haven't taken advantage of it). Combine that with insecure, unsegmented networks, and hackable WiFi, and you don't need physical access to the server room.


Caveat: I haven't written any Perl except for an occasional one-liner in a decade.

But I do a fair amount of Python, and a 20 minute cruise through the Moose docs leads me to believe that the most similar thing to Moose in the Python world is, well, Python.


Not quite. One of the biggest features of Moose is it's concept of roles. They're in some senses similar to typeclasses in Haskell and Traits in Rust.

Effectively, they give you access to parametric polymorphism in perl land.

http://modernperlbooks.com/books/modern_perl_2014/07-object-...


True.

Rather than having the kind of parametric polymorphism you get with roles, Python prefers duck typing. And for the practical use of adding some composed, reusable, but orthogonal state and behavior to a class, Python provides multiple inheritance. For type-checking issues where duck typing is not sufficient, Python has Abstract Base Classes.

Now, I am aware that roles are not the same thing as duck typing or multiple inheritance, or ABCs. Not having roles in Python is a design decision. http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3133/

But I still think in terms of the ability to use the language to write clean OOP code, Python is closer to Perl5 + Moose, than Perl5 alone is to Perl5 + Moose.

(Not a knock on Perl5 or Moose, between 2002 and 2005, I did a bunch of web and systems programming in Perl, and I wish Moose existed then.)


Not sure if you are saying it's stupid on Reddit's part, or the users'. For Reddit it's smart.

Licensing doesn't just mean making an exact copy.

Let's say Reddit was the one that packaged up a story posted on /r/nosleep/ and sold film rights—the user who posted that stuff would have an uphill battle to get anything from Reddit's profits on the arrangement.

But, as a user, you can still make your own deals (you still own and can license the content yourself to others), and you probably can only make that deal because of Reddit exposure.


exactly, /r/romesweetrome comes to mind among many others


Yes, but I think the larger point is, if Reddit pisses off the people creating interesting content, they will leave.

Reddit's user agreement doesn't mean jack if nobody is submitting anything.


A fellow Walcott fan!

"The time will come

when, with elation

you will greet yourself arriving

at your own door, in your own mirror

and each will smile at the other's welcome..."


Jumping on the acconrad bandwagon. I was completely inactive, weighed 240 when I should be around 150. But I took up heavy lifting, specifically Stronglifts 5x5 in February, then switched to Ice Cream Fitness in May.

Nothing against bodyweight stuff either. I do a light bodyweight routine two days a week to help deal with some back/posture issues ICF is not addressing well enough.

I'm down to 195, and stronger than I've been since I was in my 20s.

I tried one of those "vary your workout every day" programs last year, and quit. Not being consistent, as a newbie, made it hard to see progress, which demotivates. On ICF, while reaping noob gains, I see the weight I lift go up every session.

For me, value would be in putting in my exact workout, down to lift tempos, pauses, rest between sets, etc., and having an app run my workout for me, so I only have to think about proper form and pushing out that last rep.


I'm working in that space, and sampling from the ones I've dealt with, I'd replace some with most.

Some of the ones I deal with are also running those XPs with old IE versions, 6 & 7. This is because they bought, then never upgraded, systems that won't run right with newer browsers.


Not this year. He was unsure he could be there, so PyCon used another company. He'll be doing PyOhio in July though.


He? Just curious. Who is "he", Thanks.


Carl Karsten (http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlfkarsten) owns NextDayVideo, and is pretty synonymous with PyCon video.


If you have 3 hours to watch a tutorial, David Beazley's generators talk. Also, Jess McKellar's keynote on the sorry state of K12 CS education in the US (and some things we can do about it).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: