I think this is a cool idea and something I was interested in also, if you need any help developing it I'd pitch in!

Thanks for the feedback. I think i just need to imporove the UI and add some more stats.

Ehhh options really kinda kick ass, but only when you know what you are doing and understand the max profit and loss of a trade.

I really think Robinhood might go out of business before Gamestop.

nah this whole thing has been great press for them despite the debacles

There is such thing as bad press. Every time they've shown up in headlines, I remember how happy I am that they don't have any of my money.

After today, Id love to see RH get picked up for pennies on the dollar by Schwab treating it as a trade in at a Gamestop.

Why does it matter whether the user is using it for long-term or YOLO-ing meme stonks.

Is American Airlines a meme stock? They were halted too? Think there were any admirable long term investors wanting to buy it today? I dont know, but what I do know is that they wouldnt have the choice if they were using Robinhood.

I think the main point people are upset about is that it just feels gross when the rug can and as we saw today WILL be pulled out from under you at the discretion of a few people within their brokerage.

Going to get around to zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance

This was such a kick ass idea

That has been the sticking point with me. Having a case that attaches them to my keyring has proved to be a great convenience.

> Have you explored opportunities to apply data science to agriculture?

This is the most straightforward route imo. Just pick up some of the skills required to get going, which it sounds like they are based on the post, and just start tweaking with stuff in your field. They already have a great advantage of specialized knowledge about the subject they would be applying it to and Ag, from someone who grew up and worked on a row crop farm, seems very ripe for exploration through data science.

I never really realized how much effort goes into open source or the community dynamics that power it until I read that Working In Public book by Nadia Eghbal. Really shines a great light on the dynamics and effort required to keep alot of these projects going.

Nadia Eghbal worked at GitHub, so her perspective will be skewed by the dominant influence.

The GitHub way of working has only been around since GitHub launched. Accordingly, the free software and open source communities that predate GitHub had their own ways of working before GitHub came along. Despite the widespread perception that GitHub makes doing open source easy, it comprises a set of practices that can be and are frequently more taxing than the alternatives. If GitHub is all you know, though, or you've forgotten, or you've just not noticed and never measured it, then it's easy to think that the GutHub way embodies the essentials of development in the open, even though its workflows are pretty bloated.

What does that matter though? Is the expectation that GitHub would have managed it's open source offering outside of GitHub?

The comment was a direct response to the other (about how much effort it takes to do open source [on GitHub]). I can't make full sense of your questions, but what is possible to make out doesn't seem to follow from the comment you're replying to.

Sounds like Github want's features to please it's paying customers more than open source (which is the marketing channel), which makes sense.