Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | another_comment's commentslogin

Excellent question. I will try that tomorrow morning and report back.


>>I’d argue that a reasonable network limitation with a minimal blast ratio is responsible.

I'm the OP and I agree. Across 3 Twilio phone numbers and I maybe make 4 voice calls and 10 texts a week. I've been doing this for 4 years or more.

>> For example, I use SIP over 5060 on Spectrum without issue.

As did I, until a week or so ago. Until I was cut off, without notice. I've been a Spectrum residential customer since the 1990s.


I'm not running my own service. I'm using www.iptel.org, they offer a free sip account. Under the hood they use the Kamailio sip server. It is pretty darn reliable for a free service.

Every few months iptel.org goes down for a few hours and I get 408 request timeouts. When Spectrum blocked 5060 UDP, I got 408 request timeouts for a week. It finally dawned on me to try my iptel account on my VPS and my SIP register succeeded. That's when I knew Spectrum had shut 5060 UDP. I tried 5060 TCP and that didn't work either.


>> Guess they want you to pay for their bundled phone plan instead.

I think you are right. But I am waaaay to cheap for that. I'm using Twilio on some Raspberry Pi's with some software I wrote myself. For 3 phone numbers, I'm spending like $10 a month total.


My call quality also seems better since I've switched on the VPN. I do not have numerical proof of this, but it sure seems like my voice calls are crystal clear now.


My guess is Spectrum has been rate limiting port 5060 for a while, and finally just turned it off.

Nice.


With standard SIP implementations port 5060 is used for signaling and RTP for the actual media uses different (negotiated) ports.

Rate limiting 5060 wouldn’t have any impact on call quality.


>> There is literally no other option to watch YouTube on a TV nowadays

I use https://github.com/yuliskov/SmartTubeNext Smart Tube Next on a Firestick. I side loaded both the beta and release versions with adb. I have not seen a commercial since. If Release doesn't work, try Beta. One of them always seems to work.

>> And it's impossible to buy a dumb TV in 2022

Next best thing: I bought a Samsung TV last year and never accepted the Terms and Conditions. No ads.

Edit: fixed link syntax


Project N95 is the National Critical Equipment Clearinghouse for personal protective equipment (PPE), COVID-19 diagnostic tests and critical equipment. Edit: stupid typo on url, sorry https://www.projectn95.org/

US based non profit, not tied to amazon. I've bought their stuff. They are legit.


FYI it doesn't seem to work with the www. for me (https://n95project.org does work though, as does https://www.projectn95.org).


Thanks, I fixed the url.


I guess they just got slammed with orders?

It would be much nicer if they showed 'SOLD OUT' on anything not in stock rather than nothing. (Firefox, Linux, even on my 'no plugins' profile and after creating an account.) It just shows reviews and nothing else on any masks page.

Debug console shows...

They aren't depending on Facebook for antifruad are they? How will they ever sell to someone security minded like me that refuses to ever sign up there?

[Facebook Pixel] - Invalid PixelID: null. fbevents.js:24:37725 Some cookies are misusing the recommended “SameSite“ attribute 12 Cookie “VtexRCSessionIdv7” will be soon rejected because it has the “SameSite” attribute set to “None” or an invalid value, without the “secure” attribute. To know more about the “SameSite“ attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cook... rc.js:1:1836 Cookie “vtex_binding_address” will be soon rejected because it has the “SameSite” attribute set to “None” or an invalid value, without the “secure” attribute. To know more about the “SameSite“ attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cook... common.min.js:2:141767 Cookie “vtex_binding_address” will be soon rejected because it has the “SameSite” attribute set to “None” or an invalid value, without the “secure” attribute. To know more about the “SameSite“ attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cook... common.min.js:2:141767 Cookie “checkout.vtex.com” will be soon rejected because it has the “SameSite” attribute set to “None” or an invalid value, without the “secure” attribute. To know more about the “SameSite“ attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cook... v1 Cookie “checkout.vtex.com” will be soon rejected because it has the “SameSite” attribute set to “None” or an invalid value, without the “secure” attribute. To know more about the “SameSite“ attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cook... v1 Cookie “VtexRCMacIdv7” will be soon rejected because it has the “SameSite” attribute set to “None” or an invalid value, without the “secure” attribute. To know more about the “SameSite“ attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cook... rc.js:1:1836 Cookie “VtexRCMacIdv7” will be soon rejected because it has the “SameSite” attribute set to “None” or an invalid value, without the “secure” attribute. To know more about the “SameSite“ attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cook... 2 rc.js:1:1836 Cookie “VtexRCSessionIdv7” will be soon rejected because it has the “SameSite” attribute set to “None” or an invalid value, without the “secure” attribute. To know more about the “SameSite“ attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cook... 3 rc.js:1:1836 Cookie “_ga” will be soon rejected because it has the “SameSite” attribute set to “None” or an invalid value, without the “secure” attribute. To know more about the “SameSite“ attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cook... analytics.js:35:486 Cookie “_gid” will be soon rejected because it has the “SameSite” attribute set to “None” or an invalid value, without the “secure” attribute. To know more about the “SameSite“ attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cook... analytics.js:35:486 Cookie “_ga” will be soon rejected because it has the “SameSite” attribute set to “None” or an invalid value, without the “secure” attribute. To know more about the “SameSite“ attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cook... analytics.js:35:486 Cookie “_gid” will be soon rejected because it has the “SameSite” attribute set to “None” or an invalid value, without the “secure” attribute. To know more about the “SameSite“ attribute, read https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cook... analytics.js:35:486 Welcome to Render! Want to look under the hood? https://careers.vtex.com common.min.js:2:169250 Source map error: Error: request failed with status 404 Resource URL: https://io.vtex.com.br/rc/rc.js Source Map URL: rc.js.map

GEThttps://n95.vteximg.com.br/arquivos/favicon.ico [HTTP/2 404 Not Found 115ms]

TypeError: L is undefined default https://n95.vtexassets.com/_v/public/assets/v1/published/bun... sd https://n95.vtexassets.com/_v/public/assets/v1/npm/react-dom... fk https://n95.vtexassets.com/_v/public/assets/v1/npm/react-dom... li https://n95.vtexassets.com/_v/public/assets/v1/npm/react-dom... dk https://n95.vtexassets.com/_v/public/assets/v1/npm/react-dom... Bc https://n95.vtexassets.com/_v/public/assets/v1/npm/react-dom... ei https://n95.vtexassets.com/_v/public/assets/v1/npm/react-dom... T https://n95.vtexassets.com/_v/public/assets/v1/npm/react@0.0... onmessage https://n95.vtexassets.com/_v/public/assets/v1/npm/react@0.0... EventHandlerNonNull* https://n95.vtexassets.com/_v/public/assets/v1/npm/react@0.0... <anonymous> https://n95.vtexassets.com/_v/public/assets/v1/npm/react@0.0... <anonymous> https://n95.vtexassets.com/_v/public/assets/v1/npm/react@0.0... runScript https://shop.projectn95.org/gerson-n95-respirators-3230plus-... g https://shop.projectn95.org/gerson-n95-respirators-3230plus-... g https://shop.projectn95.org/gerson-n95-respirators-3230plus-... c https://shop.projectn95.org/gerson-n95-respirators-3230plus-... EventListener.handleEvent* https://shop.projectn95.org/gerson-n95-respirators-3230plus-... <anonymous> https://shop.projectn95.org/gerson-n95-respirators-3230plus-... react-dom.production.min.js:149:71 prefetchDefaultPages should only be called before RenderProvider's render.


> How will they ever sell to someone security minded like me that refuses to ever sign up there?

You represent a small enough proportion of the population that it's not worth their time to cater to you.


Probably, their support system mailed me back overnight asking me to use anything webkit based (using consumer terms; Edge or Chrome).

I know that Apple's other webkit fork has to be on the tested path too, but you'd think they could also at least do BASIC validation (does it work at all) against some version of Firefox (even if it isn't the Linux version).

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:95.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/95.0


>> All traffic passing through Twilio is categorized as application-to-person traffic.

Thanks, I didn't know that.

>> If you haven't registered your brand, been assigned a trust score, and registered your specific number with a specific a2p campaign, you'll be subjected to heavy filtering.

I've done none of the above. I've been using Twilio for 3 years and this is the first time I've ever had an SMS rejected. I don't get it.

>> I think voip.ms only allows person-to-person traffic. Try registering a number there and sending the same message that got blocked.

I'll give that a try.


These are relatively new restrictions - have been rolling out since this fall. https://support.twilio.com/hc/en-us/articles/1260800720410-W...

I've found sending from toll free numbers like 1-888 reduced filtering also. Only costs like a dollar or 2 a month extra.


That's not just anecdotal. The carriers do process short code and toll free traffic differently from regular 10DLC. You don't even need do register an a2p campaign for them.


This gets rejected: "(Error: 30007) Carrier violation. Your message content was flagged as going against Verizon carrier guidelines."


This gets rejected: "(Error: 30007) Verizon Carrier violation. Your message content was flagged as going against carrier guidelines."


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: