Neat! What were your experiences with the tech and how did you interface with it? Feel free to respond here or email me via my contact deets in my profile—I’d love to hear about your use-cases.
Yes that is one thing I have learned that there can be a lot of noise from these CSP violation reports.
I have found that setting up some alerts for particular resources seems to help suppress some of the noise.
I wanted to show a project that I worked on last week. securityblogs.xyz is a simple website that aggregates a bunch of news sites and blogs and displays it on a single page. I have been trying to learn Go and used HTML templating to generate the html page for the site.
Feel free to raise a new issue [1] if you would like to add a new source to the site.
Unfortunately, waiting for them to ‘get the message’ is a losing battle.
The main issue i find is that non-tech related folks just don’t care enough about this stuff to move to different platform.
Different way to tweet the tweet
> After firing half of Twitters employees, the few that do remain do not fully understand the overly complex recommendation algorithm. I am hoping that we can crowdfund development work by making it open source.
As an aside, it'll be interesting to see what license he open sources it under.
He also said the code base was very fragile. Such that any changes tended to induce many errors. Hinted that it will probably be easier to just rebuild from scratch.
It is always more fun to just rebuild. There's probably someone on the team already setting it up.
I don't think he is doing it strictly because the remaining team can't handle the development. He talked about open sourcing the recommendation algorithm before he even bought Twitter. Back in November 2022 he said:
>One of the things that I believe Twitter should do is open-source the algorithm.
>Any changes to people's tweets -- if they're emphasized or de-emphasized -- that action should be made apparent ... so there's there's no sort of behind-the-scenes manipulation, either algorithmically or manually.
I am glad that a lot of people in this thread have figured out the fraud and caught the rogue employee early on. But the reason this fraud is so prevalent is because it works.
I have a friend who had someone else go through the interview process for him and ended up getting hired at one of the top 10 largest banks in US.
Not only that, but because he was grossly under qualified for this job, he hired someone to teach him how to do his job. He works his normal 8-5, then he screen shares with this guy and they work together to complete his tasks.
I'm a bit surprised that this worked and that they still haven't caught on, he has been working there for 8-10 months now. He has been sharing company intellectual property of a top US bank to foreigners for 8-10 months.
The saddest part about this is that, he isn't a dumb, he is knowledgeable enough to get a decent job without cheating. In fact he has worked, both legally and ethically, for reputable companies.
I am still on the fence on this. On one hand this is a good pro consumer move while also being environmentally friendly but this will likely hinder innovation in the field.
If a new way charger standard was found which was a fraction of the cost of USBC and double the speed, the fact that companies would be forced to still use USBC is tough.
I also found this tidbit pretty funny.
> The legislation has been under development for more than a decade, but an agreement on its scope was reached this morning following negotiations between different EU bodies.
> The EU denies this will be the case, and says it will update the legislation as new technology is developed.
> “Don’t think we’re setting something in stone for the next 10 years,” said Breton at the press conference.
