To install Windows 11 with a local user and/or to install it without the TPM 2.0 requirement, what I found easiest was using Rufus to prepare a flash drive with the Windows 11 ISO. Rufus asks if you want to create a local user and what the user name is. It also asks if you want to skip some of the Windows 11 requirements. Then when you install Windows 11 using the flash drive it just works.
Install the browser extension Unhook. It hides all recommended YouTube videos, so when you watch a video you aren't looking at a bunch of other videos to watch. It's very customizeable, so you can choose what to hide.
Create a list of what you want to be doing and consider attaching it to your monitor or putting it just to the side so that you can easily look at it. When you feel stuck, look at this list and do something on the list. Ensure the list includes some easy to do things on it like maybe "go for a walk", "read a book", "play instrument" etc.
When trying to change habits, start off small and simple. For example, if you want to start running each day you might start by putting on your running shoes and walking to the end of the driveway and back. Start off so small that your brain can't talk you out of it.
I create daily todo lists and feel satisfaction from checking them off.
Try some ideas and see what works for you. Good luck!
I gave Firefox a try for a month, but ran into enough issues that I ended up switching back to Chrome about a week ago. Here are some of the problems I encountered that I can recall at the moment and doesn't include the many issues I managed to fix:
Copying content doesn’t always work on certain sites. For example, you can't copy an image from Photopea.com, which I rely on frequently. Saving the image to a file instead slows down my workflow too much. This is a known bug which has been around for a long time.
Password autofill was inconsistent. It didn’t work on some sites, like when accessing a Pi-hole dashboard. Maybe there’s an about:config tweak to fix this, but by that point I had already spent a lot of time troubleshooting other issues.
The bookmark menu closes after opening a single bookmark. If you like opening multiple bookmarks in a row, you have to keep reopening the menu and navigating to the next one each time, which is frustrating.
Twitch videos loaded slowly. I managed to fix this by deleting a specific file, re-creating it as a blank file, and setting it to read-only. This appears to be a known bug the developers are aware of.
Loading custom extensions is inconvenient. You can only load them temporarily unless you launch Firefox with a command-line option for each extension.
If this case reaches the Supreme Court, one key consideration is the potential pressure to support the growth of U.S. AI companies. Rather than imposing strict legal restrictions that could hinder their ability to compete globally, especially against companies in countries with more lenient regulations like China, the Court may be inclined to take a more permissive stance.
I'm surprised that AIMP hasn't been mentioned yet. It's also a great old school audio player that was released back in 2006. I transitioned to it when Winamp development was fizzling out. Not sure when that was but I've been using it for a long time. With the 'Pandemic' skin it looks like classic Winamp and has support for visualizations and many other features people tended to like from Winamp.
I had a similar problem. Coffee, decaf, even dark chocolate would be very stimulating and would mess with my sleep, even a single cup in the morning. I tried quite a few things to solve this and ended up discovering that supplementing with molybdenum solved it. Molybdenum is an essential element important in the metabolization of some compounds, including caffeine. It's cheap and may be worth trying.
Also, I found that L-Theanine helped but only for maybe a week or so before it became less and less effective. For me, it was obviously a band-aid solution that wasn't correcting the underlying problem.
I couldn't find any citations that mention molybdenum as a way to increase metabolism of caffeine. However, I found one reference [0] that mentions, "Consumption of broccoli and brassica vegetables in general and absorption of large quantities of vitamin C increase caffeine clearance".
EDIT: It would seem that the vitamin C paper [1] concludes the opposite of what [0] states. "These results indicate that the elimination of caffeine in the elderly is not affected significantly by the concentrations of vitamin C achieved during this study."
A limited number of studies suggested tobacco smoking increases the metabolism of caffeine, an effect possibly mediated by caffeine.
"Caffeine metabolism is increased by smoking, an effect mediated by an acceleration in its demethylation (it also increases xanthine oxidase activity) (Parsons and Neims, 1978). Smoking cessation returns caffeine clearance rates to nonsmoking values (Murphy et al., 1988)."
A Google Scholar search for "molybdenum purine" will come up with many studies discussing how molybdenum is involved in purine catabolism. For example, the following article states "[molybdenum] is considered essential because it is part of a complex called molybdenum cofactor that is required for the three mammalian enzymes xanthine oxidase (XO), aldehyde oxidase (AO), and sulfite oxidase (SO). XO participates in the metabolism of purines". (https://aspenjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.117...).
When I was younger I was able to drink multiple pots of coffee in a day and even drink coffee right before going to sleep without any obvious issues. So when I couldn't even drink a single cup of coffee in the morning on a regular basis without problems I had reason to believe there was something wrong with me and it wasn't simply a genetic quirk.
I find discussion about caffeine sensitivity in humans rather fascinating given the very broad range of the amount required to induce an effect.
If those above are to be believed (or not suffering a psychosomatic response) and are still affected by decaffeinated coffee then the dosage between different individuals for given psychotropic effects to occur could be as high as 100:1.
As someone who can drink copious nubmers of cups of coffee in a single sitting and notice very little effect I'm curious to know why this range is so wide (heaven help patients, doctors and pharmaceutical manufacturers if all drugs had such a wide range).
Whenever I raise this the common retort is that I've developed a tolerance to caffeine, and no doubt that's true to some extent. But from experience it's pretty limited, I've been in situations where I've not had caffeinated drinks for months and not noticed any difference when I returned to them. Also, decades ago when I was a student I took up coffee to help stay awake whilst studying and it was pretty inefective. I tried evey strong brew availabe including up to five heaped teaspoons of Moccona instant coffee per cup and it was like water off a duck's back—almost useless/inefective.
The question is why do some people have a supersensitive response to caffeine whilst others do not.
There are stimulating compounds in coffee other than caffeine, so I've pondered that people who find decaf stimulating may be reacting to some of these other compounds.
Another consideration is that people seem to often report that coffee is more stimulating than caffeine pills, even if the amount of caffeine is similar.
"There are stimulating compounds in coffee other than caffeine,…"
OK, that makes sense and I'm not surprised. I claim no expertise in coffee chemistry but I'd guess there'd likely be small amounts of other xanthines including xanthine, theophyline, theobromine [we ought to stop using that confusing name] and perhaps others. Are you referring to these or another class of drugs altogether?
You know, your mention that others report coffee more stimulating than caffeine pills got me thinking. As I said in my other comment, caffeine did little for me when I was studying, heaps of instant coffee made very little difference. I'd not mentioned it but I'd also tried OTC caffeine pills and they were pretty useless (and instant coffee was cheaper).
Now to an interesting connection you've just reminded me of. Some years after I'd finished studying (trying to stay awake with caffeine), we used to frequent a little French restaurant that served an unusual type of coffee that I enjoyed very much.
Being a frequent customer I asked the owner what type of coffee he was serving and he told me it was a special New Guinea blend that he'd specifically selected for the restaurant.
Now to the interesting part: as I said, many cups of caffeine-laden coffee have little effect on me but this coffee was something else altogether. Within a short time of consuming a cup or two I'd get a sudden urge to urinate, similarly my partner and the coffee had an even stronger effect on her than it did me. This wasn't an isolated case, it happened whenever we went to the restaurant, in fact we used to joke about it.
I need to add that I've always had a pretty good bladder, for example I've crossed the Pacific from Los Angeles to Sydney numbers of times without needing to use the restroom. So there was something rather unusual about that coffee. It's only a guess but I'd reckon it likely had much more than the usual trace of theophyline in it. Perhaps there were much higher levels other xanthines as well.
Hum, now I'm wondering whether these methylxanthines can act synergistically when in certain combinations/ratios. If it wasn't one or more of them in combination in that coffee then I wonder what other drug could have caused the strong diuretic effect.
I'm no coffee chemistry expert either, but the following article indicates that the main adenosine receptor antagonists are caffeine, theophylline, and theobromine, all of which are found in coffee, tea, and chocolate (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adenosine_receptor). These three are all considered purines and therefore molybdenum would be involved in breaking them down. All three also have a diuretic effect (1) and Theobromine "shows strong diuretic effects" (2). That leads me to wonder if the ratio of these three varies significantly between coffees. I'm not sure but found one paper that shows that it does in cocoa (3), so perhaps it does in coffee also (there's probably research on coffee about this and I just didn't look hard enough).
Thanks for the references. Just had an initial look and I'll return to them shortly. I was already aware the action of xanthine class drugs is centered on the adenosine receptors but I've little deeper knowledge of the subject, drugs and their biological action isn't my field so I'll have to take the documents slowly.
However, I've already noted in (2) a statement under Theobromine that it's a strong diuretic. That's interesting but what does strong mean here? I dislike simple-notion words in papers unless they're quantified (they require numbers against them).
That said, that's not a criticism of the paper having just glanced at it, and it has lots of other interesting stuff I'll need to read in detail. What's particularly relevant about the theobromine entry is this mention of the molecule's strong diuretic effect. When I made my point towards the end of my comment that that particular coffee 'likely had much more than the usual trace of theophyline in it', I deliberately left out reference to theobromine because I'd seen references that it was biologically less active than either theophyline and caffeine.
What was implied was that when evaluating the effects of coffee that theobromine was essentially considered irrelevant because it wasn't as biologically potent as
either theophyline and caffeine and that its concentration in coffee is considerably lower than either of the other two.
Perhaps the earlier reference (which I've to locate again) was referring to theobromine's psychotropic effects rather than its diuretic effects. I'll now have to review and revise my understanding of common xanthines to correct my misunderstandings.
As someone who's not professionally involved in this field I sometimes think I'm a little mad for allowing my curiosity to get the better of me. :-)
Did taking molybdenum improve metabolism of caffeine in your case?
Did you have blood markers checked? For me, some values like GPT/GGT are in fact increased for unknown reasons.
I recently and unsuccessfuly researched ways to participate in studies, as I'd like to understand why I can't eat chocolate or drink coffee anymore.. I'm slightly concerned other toxins wouldn't be metabolized as well either, leading to early cancer down the road.
I took 1 mg of molybdenum daily for about 3 weeks and then tested out drinking coffee. By this point I had tried many other interventions that did not help. I wasn't expecting the molybdenum to help but figured it was worth a shot since it was about $6 for a bottle. After the fourth day of drinking coffee, it was clear that something had changed; the coffee was no longer the issue that it had been. I'm now able to enjoy a regular coffee in the morning without any negative issues. I didn't change my diet or supplements during this time or anything else I can think of that could possibly have contributed to this change.
When I was sensitive to coffee I felt just wrecked and exhausted by the coffee. I couldn't sleep well at night. Several days in a row of drinking one coffee in the morning and I'd get to the point where I would wake up feeling jittery the next day. Now, this is completely resolved.
My blood tests for commonly tested health markers such GPT and GGT have always been fine and tend to be tested about once a year. I had the coffee sensitivity for quite a few years until recently when I finally resolved it.
I do have some minor gut issues, so I'm guessing this is to blame for any nutritional deficiencies (I eat a healthy diet of "real" food).
Very interesting suggestion, will look into it. L-theanine has long been a staple of mine to counteract the effects of coffee. Typically have to redose at 4am, as the cortisol spike keeps me awake otherwise (that is, from a small coffee 26hrs ago..)
These days I'm limiting my intake to once a month or so
How long did it take to see significant improvement and how long did it take before you figured you had restored perfect function? Can you elaborate on what you ate?
About 1 months for initial "OK, I'm not going to die" and about 3-4 months total.
I would make a several pound salad as my first meal of the day using cruciferous mix from Trader Joes. Mixed with shredded iceberg, raw vegetables (peppers, broccoli), crumbled corn chips, and par-boiled Tempe, and maybe a bit of shredded cheese. Dressing of choice.
For the first month I ate nothing but the salad(s) each day.
Often Greek yogurt with hulled hemp seeds and flax powder or nuts for desert.
Quick taibata session on the elliptical each day. Trained Krav-maga twice a week.
The most interesting thing to me is that I don't know how it got so bad. I was not eating junk, drinking soda or alcohol. Was getting decent exercise regularly. Drank water religiously. I had no antibiotics. I was admittedly eating a lot of home made bread products and was not eating enough raw foods in the runup to this issue.
This one hurts...
I visited the Living Computer Museum in 2017 and it was amazing. Here's a selection of some photos I took:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/VUVXQ1cG3zWAMWY3A
My favorite photo here is the one of the Xerox Altos available to play multiplayer Maze War (one is a real Alto and the other two are emulated).
Every time I try Krita I bounce off of it because the controls are too different from Photoshop. For my relatively simple use cases, Krita could be a replacement for Photoshop, which I've been using on and off for roughly 30 years. The muscle memory runs deep. Just something simple like holding alt to toggle the magnifying glass between zoom-in/zoom-out doesn't work in Krita and the configuration doesn't allow for this.
https://www.radgametools.com/pixo/PixoWithUnreal2004.txt
Further discussion about it here:
https://forums.beyondunreal.com/threads/software-rendering-i...