Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Terry_B's commentslogin

It's all who you know? http://sivers.org/xn

"Luckily, who you know is up to you, not luck."


Working in the aerospace industry for a number of years, I've seen and created all types of crazy spreadsheets to design aircraft and ensure they are safe to fly.

The good thing about the engineering industry though is that all those spreadsheets get checked by someone more senior than you.

The problem is though, thanks to the increased usage of finite element analysis and more detailed models, the amount of data being pushed around in spreadsheets has grown exponentially.

Far beyond the ability of someone to reasonably check it all.


In addition to the other reasons here, I think when it comes to lawyers and doctors, people typically want "the best".

Are you willing to take a risk with your health or getting into legal trouble?

So the price of the best people just keeps going up and up.

With developers, there is more of a concept of "good enough". As long as you find someone that can build the thing and it works, that's good enough.


You're still way up the pointy end of the business though. You are directly involved in acquiring customers.

I think the OP was making the contrast more with people who try and reduce the companies admin overhead slightly by automating parts of the accounting system.

That type of thing is easy for a company to put off and involves getting through cultural change and threatening people's turf to implement. A harder path.


Agreed. My point was simply being a rainmaker isn't enough. You need to give your boss or client a defensible position to take about hiring you. One that makes them look good to their bosses, boards, etc... (i.e. lowering a CPA sells a much stronger fantasy than acquiring customers at a higher but acceptable rate.)


This is a great point. I've been trying to think of as many things programmers can do that increase revenue as possible.

A/B Testing and sales funnel optimization is definitely a winner.

- Optimizing how a company utilises it's resources

- Optimizing the speed and performance of a critical business function.

- Increasing marketing reach

- Generating more sales leads

What else guys?


The obvious thing to do is to find ways to incorporate Growth Hacks into the product.

One such formula would be to browse API's on programmableweb, and other places looking for opportunities to leverage other sites audience as a platform.

Another thing you can do is profile an audience and crunch big data to help find new opportunities...


I actually think of your first two points (optimizing...) as cost cutting services, while the other two are good examples.


Yeah, should have been more specific. If they result in the company getting more sales done with the available time/resources then they add to revenue.

The company could of course treat it as "doing more with less" and therefore use it for cost cutting instead. Depends on the situation.


I guess that depends on if they could hire twice as many people in sales and double their revenue. If there are diminishing returns, then it could be a revenue generator.


"The price is still up 30 percent on the year but far from its 74 percent increase a few months back."


I think Twitter understands that there is a much lower barrier to leaving their service for a competitor, compared to the other social services.

What data do you have in Twitter that you wouldn't be prepared to leave behind?


Only the graph, rebuilding your following/ followers would be a pain. Which makes sense that if they are going to be a pain about anything it is restricting access to rebuilding the graph on competing services.


Wish you guys the best of luck! As someone who has worked on and thought about location based gaming like this for a long time but failed to launch I'm really hoping you guys pull it off. We even called our prototype "Turf" :)

Location based gaming throws up a lot of challenges and problems that we felt were less than ideal as a gaming experience and instead of just launching something, we over analysed and try to solve them all upfront (without evidence that they are really problems). My only advice is just launch!


I always figure that the maintenance guy and probably half the staff know the master code.


[OT] Why is it that I knew he was a fellow Australian the second the video popped up and without volume? The brain is a crazy thing.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: