Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | LunaSea's commentslogin

Oats are already one of the most protein dense foods

Oats are about 15% calories from protein, 85% from carbs.

High protein foods would be: egg white (90% calories from protein), chicken breast (80%), lean fish such as cod (90%)

medium protein foods would be: fatty beef (e.g. ribeye) 50% calories from protein, cottage cheese (60%), fatty fish like salmon (55% calories from protein), whole eggs (fatty yolk plus white, 36% calories from protein), soybeans (36-40%)

low protein foods would be: lentils (30%), 2% milk (26% calories from protein), lima beans (22% protein), parmesan cheese (30%), summer squash/zuccini (24% protein), most mushrooms (25-30%).

very-low protein foods would be: rice (9%), onions (9%), winter squash (10%), red bell peppers (12-13%), sweet corn (12%)

Here, by very low, I mean if you try to get your protein from these sources, you will end up obese unless you expend extreme amounts of energy exercising or maintain serious protein deficiencies (muscle loss). You can get decent amount of protein if you are downing lentils, whole milk, parmesan, soybeans, salmon, etc, e.g. you don't need to eat high protein foods, but this is about the bottom level to get reasonable protein while maintaining reasonable weight unless you are a day laborer or expending massive calories.

At only 15% calories from protein (the rest being carbs), oats would be not much better than corn in terms of protein content per calorie consumed. Nothing wrong with eating some corn on the cob, but that's not gonna be a major source of protein for anyone unless you are willing to consume huge amounts of carbs.


I assume they mean non animal sources of protein. Of course it'll be hard for plant based foods to compete. Out of non animal sources, oatmeal is pretty good, especially as a cheap staple food no less

The human body does not grade on a curve. There is as much protein in oatmeal per calorie as there is in red bell peppers and obviously people don't cite red bell peppers as a high protein food, this is true even if for some reason they really prefer to eat red bell peppers.

If you want something from non-animal sources, go for mushrooms and soybeans, which have twice as much protein per calorie as oats. Mushrooms are an under-rated source of protein, as is cottage cheese.


If you wouldn’t mind indulging me, I’m very curious how you came to be of that opinion

They are asking for the end of end-to-end encryption so client side image hashing comparison is clearly not what they want to do.

Israel also recently killed three UN soldiers and bombarded positions a few meters away from french soldiers. The french ministry of defence wasn't exactly thrilled with this.

It's precisely because they graduated 5000+ companies that fraud is more difficult to avoid.

They scaled up massively the size of each batch and their frequency to a point where they are incapable of auditing them.


Maybe someone should start an auditing company for YC... oh

There is too much friction in the audit process… someone needs to solve this

In other unrelated news, the C-suite is expecting a raise this year.

Of course they are sending millions of pounds a day to other countries. In this case China for the panels.

They're not burning panels.

Micro grids are legal outside of Germany like in Belgium

I like the transition to renewables , but there is nothing inevitable about it.

We don't produce solar panels or have the materials to produce them in Europe. So we're just as dependent on imports as before.


It's aluminum, glass, silicon, and some conductive metal. Surely you all have those materials.

And even if you don't make them yourselves, they aren't make and then burn like fossil fuels, they are durable infrastructure, you don't have to replace them often - they have an expected lifespan of >30 years. Buy as many as China will sell you, and once you have more than enough installed, you're good for a long time, regardless of whether they cut you off.

I think being reliant on the fossil fuel supply chain for so long, it's a bit tricky to mindset shift that once these things are installed, you're just good. And they're super fungible, you don't need any precision replacement parts, so you can make your own replacement parts if you want.


> expected lifespan of >30 years

More like <25 years.

> I think being reliant on the fossil fuel supply chain for so long

France isn't. And they are net exporting their (nuclear fission) electricity to their neighbours who shut down nuclear power plants.


Yes, and France currently has a huge problem with keeping their plants online in the summer when it's too warm. And building new plants is outrageously expensive, see Hinkley Point C. Oh, ans you still need to import fission material, so you're dependent again on other countries. Nuclear was good in the 70s, now it's beaten thoroughly by renewables.

The Swedish government is very pro renewables, yet it is initiating large investments in nuclear because they believe it is the only way to ensure enough electricity for the larger and larger need for it in the near future. I’d say they have some good information to base that decision on, since you’re right it’s really expensive, but also it’s the only way to get large amounts of production when the sun ain’t shining (all winter here) and there’s no wind (also happens a lot in the colder months).

Right, a mix of uncorrelated sources is much more resilient than 100% renewables. Of the cleantech industry people I listen to, none of them are advocating for 100% renewables, you need a mix for grid reliability. But renewables can take on much of the load. And overpaneling can help significantly, and makes a lot more sense now that solar is super cheap.

Most panels have a 25 year 80% production warranty. Unless they're planning on being out of business, they're not planning on them lasting <25 years. So their useful life is significantly longer than 30 years, unless we come up with massively more efficient panels and the land opportunity cost is high enough that we should swap them out rather than let them just keep pumping out electricity.

After 25 years, their production has dropped to 80%.

Unlike what you imply, they don't explode and you have to replace them all. They just keep producing, but less.


I don't know about others but personally I'd like my electricity source to not be constantly degrading over time and requiring maintenance crews to go out and replace the panels as they randomly start falling below the required efficiency levels. I'd prefer if the entire production unit was a single all-inclusive compound maintained by the team on site, with a relatively compact ecological footprint.

So tell us what you have there that doesn't need maintenance over 25 years.

Panels you buy today come with 20 year warranties.

The observed lifespan of DER assets is consistently longer than the manufacturer’s (or insurance company’s) rating

Your comment makes no sense. If the Middle Eat oil gets cut off, you're suffering within days. If China cuts off solar panels, you have many plenty of time to find an alternative source or ramp up your own production.

If you chase down all inputs into everything you need to generate power you will find you're not truly independent from anyone. But solar panels and various other renewables hardware is much easier to stockpile than oil.

> but there is nothing inevitable about it

The Middle East is not going back to normal any time soon. The Israeli/US attack on Iran is a strategic catastrophe, implemented by two felons advised by ideologues and incompetents. The conditions are right to make oil more expensive for a long time, regardless of the outcome of the war. True peace is very unlikely to never be achieved. For instance: Iran now has a massive incentive to build nukes.

Meanwhile solar panel, wind farm, and battery prices are dropping like a rock and they avoid all of the problems of oil. Only the most ideologically fixated wouldn't invest in and install renewables. Anything that makes huge amounts of money is indeed inevitable.


Those imports have a much longer half life than barrels of oil.

But at the moments they cover only a tiny percentage of our electricity needs, not even talking about storage or the heating needs which usually come from gas.

You objected that switching to solar would still leave the EU dependent on imports. Even if that is true the dependence isn't remotely equivalent.

You're missing Moldova as well.

And yes, Russia keeps invading, hacking, politically pressuring and organising disinformation campaigns to make these ex-USSR countries fall back into Russia's bloody wing.


Sure, but so far this has nothing to do with bringing USSR back.

Yup, just a coincidence.

I'm just saying that

>fall back into Russia's bloody wing.

does not equal recreating USSR.


Could you expand on the design flaw in question?


OpenVPN looks like a regular tls stream - difficult to distinguish between that and a HTTPS connection. WireGuard looks like WireGuard. But you can wrap WireGuard in whatever headers you might want to obfuscate it and the perf will still be better.


It's trivial to make WireGuard look like a regular TLS stream. It's probably not worth a 15 year regression in security characteristics just to get that attribute; just write the proxy for it and be done with it. It was a 1 day project for us (we learned the hard way that a double digit percentage of our users simply couldn't speak UDP and had to fix that).


It is, we did the same. It is a shame that only Linux supports proper fake TCP though.


Doesn't the Chinese firewall perform sophisticated filtering? Fake TCP should not be difficult to catch. I recall reading how the firewall uses proxies to initiate connections just to see whats up.


You can host a decoy on the server side.


I don't suppose you'd release it, please?


It's part of `flyctl`, which is open source.


>OpenVPN looks like a regular tls stream - difficult to distinguish between that and a HTTPS connection.

I thought openvpn had some weird wrapper on top of TLS that makes it easily detectable? Also to bypass state of the art firewalls (eg. China's gfw), it's not sufficient to be just "tls". Doing TLS-in-TLS produces telltale statistical signatures that are easily detectable, so even simpler protocols like http CONNECT proxy over TLS can be detected.


Raw OpenVPN is very easy to distinguish, its handshake signature is very different from the regular TLS.

OpenVPN is fine if you want to tunnel through a hotel network that blocks UDP, but it's useless if you want to defeat the Great China Firewall or similar blocks.


It is not a design flaw, but a design choice.

>OpenVPN does not store any of your private data, including IP addresses, on VPN servers, which is ideal.

https://www.pcmag.com/comparisons/openvpn-vs-wireguard-which...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: