No one is doing it that way though. Also to be truly privacy-preserving you cannot rely on anything that requires any specific OS (especially Android or iOS) as every single OS requires some compromises to privacy.
The only privacy-preserving (effective) age verification is asking user if they are over 18 and requiring that they answer truthfully under penalty of perjury. Then prosecute the kids who claim they are over 18. For reason or another no one seems to be pushing for that option.
Well it exists in Privacy Pass, which is deployed in production. And there are countries that are currently actively looking into privacy-preserving age verification. I don't think that "I keep saying that age verification fundamentally leaks your ID, which is wrong, but it's still valid because nobody will notice" is a good argument.
> The only privacy-preserving (effective) age verification is asking user if they are over 18 and requiring that they answer truthfully under penalty of perjury.
I disagree, I think that there could be a sane debate around ZK age verification, if we could elevate it to that.
We just tried their cloud offering and idk if that's new to them and still in "beta" but you are limited to the amount of VMs you can start because "your account is new" and I have not found a way to open a channel of communication where you can lift that. Other than that their prices are hard to beat
My experience with small-scale hosting for a few years there (on an enterprise user account) met no problems - but, also, we met no technical problems requiring interaction with support staff.
Yes because I value openness and honesty even when it is uncomfortable sometimes. But only when they ask me and give me a chance to tell them that it doesn't reflect me but mainly the profitable tech industry.
