Yes, I've never really understood the complaint about python packaging - building native code is not something that is ever easy to guarantee across multiple distributions and operating systems.
Those native packages can be in any language and require any odd combination of tools to build. Who has truly solved that problem?
If you got object files you can compile whatever if you have the compiler toolset.
I have made a go program that links ffmpeg and is built from linux to Windows and Macos. It was not super easy but it's doable.
flatpak, docker ? i.e. include an almost complete distribution just to make one package work? but what if you want that package to work in the distribution you have now? What if you need 2 different packages that are in different flatpacks or different docker images?
Well, if you're using GRPC anyway, and have the protocol buffers already... It's hard to resist the temptation after a few hours of installing broken package versions.
Incidentally, I suspect this is the spiritual origin of microservoces...
obviously don't try those first I'm just saying there's a stack of options to work with for any level of isolation you desire.
start with wheels if you just want pre-built binaries,
move up to conda if you need arch and OS-specific C libs that depend on system packages,
flatpack or docker if you dont want those to mess up your host,
or unikernel/firecracker/VMs if you need kernel modules or hardware virtualization.
Those native packages can be in any language and require any odd combination of tools to build. Who has truly solved that problem?