2TB of bandwidth is $7/mo on AWS Lightsail. You can argue market segmentation but surely the bar for "enterprise" pricing should be something with enterprise costs. I as the sole user of my VPS can hit 2TB of bandwidth a month easily, it's just not that much.

When AWS, the company known for price gouging for bandwidth, sells for 1/1000 the cost the problem might you.

>2TB of bandwidth is $7/mo on AWS Lightsail. [...]

>When AWS, the company known for price gouging for bandwidth, sells for 1/1000 the cost the problem might you.

That's a slightly misleading thing to say when lightsail is specifically their low-end offering, designed to compete with other low cost VPS providers like linode or digital ocean. When people are complaining about AWS "price gouging" for bandwidth, they're talking about the $0.09/GB[1], or $180 for 2TB.

[1] https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/on-demand/

If lightsail was comparable Webflow wouldn't have a business. It's like saying a Bentley and a lawnmover are the same because they both require fuel.

The segmentation is, and has always been, based not on underlying costs, but on an understanding of what the segment can bear.

But the person you're responding to is comparing the fuel (bandwidth) and not the vehicles.

He said "up from $468" not $40.

He said:

>They're forcing me to pay $15,000/year, up from $468!

$468/year = 39/month